Bacterial adhesion not inhibited by ion-releasing bioactive glass filler

Nagaoka, Noriyuki; Maruo, Yukinori; Sano, Hidehiko; Yoshida, Yasuhiro; Meerbeek, Bart Van

doi:10.1016/j.dental.2017.04.002

Cited by 46 publications

(54 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The antibacterial effects of S-PRG filler-containing resin composite is mainly attributed to release of BO 3 3− and F − , and fluoride-recharging abilities [ 53 , 54 ]. Yoshihara et al investigated that bioactive glass filler may promote bacterial adhesion because of the unstable surface integrity, releasing ions and dissolving, which results in rougher restoration surfaces [ 55 ].…”

Section: Chemical Characteristics Of Dental Materialsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Influence of Dental Prosthesis and Restorative Materials Interface on Oral Biofilms

Huang

Zhou

et al. 2018

IJMS

144

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Oral biofilms attach onto both teeth surfaces and dental material surfaces in oral cavities. In the meantime, oral biofilms are not only the pathogenesis of dental caries and periodontitis, but also secondary caries and peri-implantitis, which would lead to the failure of clinical treatments. The material surfaces exposed to oral conditions can influence pellicle coating, initial bacterial adhesion, and biofilm formation, due to their specific physical and chemical characteristics. To define the effect of physical and chemical characteristics of dental prosthesis and restorative material on oral biofilms, we discuss resin-based composites, glass ionomer cements, amalgams, dental alloys, ceramic, and dental implant material surface properties. In conclusion, each particular chemical composition (organic matrix, inorganic filler, fluoride, and various metallic ions) can enhance or inhibit biofilm formation. Irregular topography and rough surfaces provide favorable interface for bacterial colonization, protecting bacteria against shear forces during their initial reversible binding and biofilm formation. Moreover, the surface free energy, hydrophobicity, and surface-coating techniques, also have a significant influence on oral biofilms. However, controversies still exist in the current research for the different methods and models applied. In addition, more in situ studies are needed to clarify the role and mechanism of each surface parameter on oral biofilm development.

show abstract

Section: Chemical Characteristics Of Dental Materialsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Influence of Dental Prosthesis and Restorative Materials Interface on Oral Biofilms

Huang

Zhou

et al. 2018

IJMS

144

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Bioactive glass (BAG) is another type of bioceramic, which has gained popularity since its invention in 1969 by Prof. Hench. It consists mainly of silicon, calcium, sodium, phosphorous, and oxygen 5) . These biomaterials have extensively been used in bone repair, tissue regeneration, coatings, drug delivery devices, and tumour treatment 6,7) .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A review of bioceramics-based dental restorative materials

Khan

Syed

2019

Dent. Mater. J.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Currently, much has been published related to conventional resin-based composites and adhesives; however, little information is available about bioceramics-based restorative materials. The aim was to structure this topic into its component parts and to highlight the translational research that has been conducted up to the present time. A literature search was done from indexed journals up to September 2017. The main search terms used were based on dental resin-based composites, dental adhesives along with bioactive glass and the calcium phosphate family. The results showed that in 123 articles, amorphous calcium phosphate (39.83%), hydroxyapatite (23.5%), bioactive glass (16.2%), dicalcium phosphate (5.69%), monocalcium phosphate monohydrate (3.25%), and tricalcium phosphate (2.43%) have been used in restorative materials. Moreover, seven studies were found related to a newly developed commercial bioactive composite. The utilization of bioactive materials for tooth restorations can promote remineralization and a durable seal of the tooth-material interface.

show abstract

“…46,47 Yapılan bir çalışmada, BAC partikülleri içeren kompozit rezinlerin istenen antimikrobiyal etkiyi göstermediklerini ve yüzeylerinde bakteri adezyonunu önleyemediklerini bildirmişlerdir. 48 Bu çalışmayla uyumlu olarak bizim çalışmamızda da tükürükle temas eden BAC içeren örneklerde NÇS grubuna oranla daha fazla C. albicans tutulumu olmuştur. Bu sonuçlar bize, BAC partiküllerinin istenen düzeyde C. albicans adezyonuna engel olamadıklarını gösterdi.…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

Comparison of Composite Resins Containing Bioactive Glass and Nano-Zinc Silicium Complex in Terms of Candida Albicans Adhesion

Tunçdemir¹,

Gülseren²

2020

Turkiye Klinikleri J Dental Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

İki farklı antibakteriyel ajan ile üretilmiş kompozitlerin Candida albicans (C. albicans) adezyonunu değerlendirmektir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Biyoaktif Cam (BAC) ve Nano-Çinko Silisyum (NÇS) içeren kompozitlerden toplamda 40 adet örnek hazırlandı (n=10). Deney grupları 1. Grup: Kontrol (antibakteriyel ajan ilavesi yok); 2. Grup: %10 BAC; 3. Grup: %10 NÇS; 4. Grup: %10 BAC +%10 NÇS olarak oluşturuldu. Her grupta örneklerin yarısına tükürükle muamele edildi, diğer yarısı distile suda bekletildi. C. albicans ATCC 14053 Sabouraud Dextrose Agar'da 37°C'de aerobik koşullarda 48 saat inkübe edildi. Örneklerin üzerine 2' şer mililitre hazırlanan maya solüsyonu dağıltıldı ve 37°C'de başlangıç adezyonu için 2 saat inkübe edildi. Mikroskobik inceleme için örnekler steril metilen mavisiyle boyandı. Bağlanması gerçekleşen maya hücreleri ışık mikroskobu altında bir araştırmacı tarafından sayıldı. Sonuçlar hücre sayısı/alan şeklinde belirlendi. Elde edilen veriler Two-way ANOVA testi analiz edildi. Bulgular: Materyal çeşidinin C. albicans adezyonuna etkisi olduğu tespit edildi (p=0,006). Tükürükle kaplı olmasının C. albicans adezyonunda etkili olduğu saptandı (p=0,001). Tükürükle kaplı örneklerde, BAC'nın C. albicans adezyonu NÇS ile karşılaştırıldığında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulundu (p=0,047). Tükürükle kaplı olmayan örneklerde, BAC'da kontrol grubuna göre C. albicans adezyonunu istatistiksel olarak anlamlı olduğu tespit edildi (p=0,02). Sonuç: Farklı antibakteriyel ajan içeren kompozit gruplarının farklı miktarlarda C. albicans adezyonu gösterdikleri tespit edildi. Tükürükle muamelenin, deney gruplarında C. albicans adezyonunu artırdığı gözlendi. Anah tar Ke li me ler: Candida albicans; biyoaktif cam; kompozit rezin ABS TRACT Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate Candida albicans (C. albicans) adhesion of composites with two different antibacterial agents. Material and Methods: A total of 40 samples were prepared from composites containing bioactive glass (BAC) and Nano-Zinc Silicium (NÇS) (n=10). Experimental groups were fabricated as Group 1: Control (no addition of antibacterial agent); Group 2: 10% BAC; Group 3: 10% NÇS; Group 4: 10% BAC+10% NÇS. In each group half of the samples were treated with saliva and the others were kept in distilled water. C. albicans ATCC 14053 was incubated at 37C for 48 hours in aerobic conditions on Sabouraud Dextrose Agar. 2 mL of prepared yeast solution was dispersed onto the samples and incubated for 2 hours at 37C for initial adhesion. The samples were stained with sterile methylene blue. Attached yeast cells were counted by a researcher under light microscopy. The results were determined as cell number/area. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA test. Results: Material type had an effect on C. albicans adhesion (p=0.006). Saliva coated was effective on C. albicans adhesion (p=0.001). There was a significantly difference between BAC-NÇS in saliva-coated samples (p=0.047). C. albicans adhesion on BAC was found statistically significant than control group in non-saliva sa...

show abstract

Bacterial adhesion not inhibited by ion-releasing bioactive glass filler

Cited by 46 publications

References 26 publications

Influence of Dental Prosthesis and Restorative Materials Interface on Oral Biofilms

Influence of Dental Prosthesis and Restorative Materials Interface on Oral Biofilms

A review of bioceramics-based dental restorative materials

Comparison of Composite Resins Containing Bioactive Glass and Nano-Zinc Silicium Complex in Terms of Candida Albicans Adhesion

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About