2013
DOI: 10.3354/dao02593
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bacterial distribution and tissue targets following experimental Edwardsiella ictaluri infection in Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus

Abstract: Edwardsiella ictaluri, a Gram-negative enteric bacterium, is the known etiological agent of enteric septicemia of catfish. In the last few years, different strains have been implicated as the causative agent of mortality events in cultured fish, including Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus L. Due to the emergent nature of edwardsiellosis in non-ictalurid fish, little is known about the dynamics of E. ictaluri infection in tilapia. The purpose of this study was to gain a better understanding of the pathogenesis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
24
2
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
24
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Lane 1: R18-14-1; Lane 2: R18-14-2; Lane 3: R18-14-13; Lane 4: R18-14-16; Lane 5: R17-63; Lane 6: R18-35-2; Lane 7: Eco2413; Lane 8: Eco2417; Lane 9: E. anguillarum LADL 05-105; Lane 10: E. piscicida S11-285; Lane 11: E. tarda FL95-01; Lane 12: E. coli ATCC 25,922; and Lane 13: no template control. Iregui, Guarín, Tibatá, & Ferguson, 2012), E. ictaluri (Soto et al, 2012;Soto, Illanes, Revan, Griffin, & Riofrio, 2013) and E. piscicida (Griffin et al, 2014), although not all E. tarda identifications may be reliable (Reichley et al, 2017). Lesions described particularly for E. piscicida and E. ictaluri resemble those seen here, suggesting the respective diseases may not be differentiated by histopathology.…”
mentioning
confidence: 53%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Lane 1: R18-14-1; Lane 2: R18-14-2; Lane 3: R18-14-13; Lane 4: R18-14-16; Lane 5: R17-63; Lane 6: R18-35-2; Lane 7: Eco2413; Lane 8: Eco2417; Lane 9: E. anguillarum LADL 05-105; Lane 10: E. piscicida S11-285; Lane 11: E. tarda FL95-01; Lane 12: E. coli ATCC 25,922; and Lane 13: no template control. Iregui, Guarín, Tibatá, & Ferguson, 2012), E. ictaluri (Soto et al, 2012;Soto, Illanes, Revan, Griffin, & Riofrio, 2013) and E. piscicida (Griffin et al, 2014), although not all E. tarda identifications may be reliable (Reichley et al, 2017). Lesions described particularly for E. piscicida and E. ictaluri resemble those seen here, suggesting the respective diseases may not be differentiated by histopathology.…”
mentioning
confidence: 53%
“…In addition to E. anguillarum , disease outbreaks in tilapia have been attributed to E. tarda (El‐Seedy, Radwan, Abd, & Sayed, ; Iregui, Guarín, Tibatá, & Ferguson, ), E. ictaluri (Soto et al, ; Soto, Illanes, Revan, Griffin, & Riofrio, ) and E. piscicida (Griffin et al, ), although not all E. tarda identifications may be reliable (Reichley et al, ). Lesions described particularly for E. piscicida and E. ictaluri resemble those seen here, suggesting the respective diseases may not be differentiated by histopathology.…”
Section: Antimicrobial Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (Mics) Againmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, with the rapid development of the tilapia culture industry, various bacterial diseases frequently outbreak due to intensified culture and high stocking density conditions of intensive farming. Pathogens, such as streptococcosis (Anshary, Kurniawan, Sriwulan, Ramli, & Baxa, ; Verner‐Jeffreys et al., ), edwardsiellosis (Kwon, Nam, Kim, & Kim, ; Park & Jeong, ; Soto, Illanes, Revan, Griffin, & Riofrio, ; Soto et al., ), columnaris disease (Dong, Lafrentz, Pirarat, & Rodkhum, ; Sebastiao, Nomura, Sakabe, & Pilarski, ), francisellosis (Assis, Tavares, Pereira, Figueiredo, & Leal, ; Ortega et al., ; Sebastiao, Pilarski, Kearney, & Soto, ) and motile aeromonas septicaemia (Dong et al., ; Li & Cai, ; Soto‐Rodriguez, Cabanillas‐Ramos, Alcaraz, Gomez‐Gil, & Romalde, ), have resulted in substantial economic losses to the local aquaculture industries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%