2010
DOI: 10.1037/a0017103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: Meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work.

Abstract: As corporate scandals proliferate, practitioners and researchers alike need a cumulative, quantitative understanding of the antecedents associated with unethical decisions in organizations. In this meta-analysis, the authors draw from over 30 years of research and multiple literatures to examine individual ("bad apple"), moral issue ("bad case"), and organizational environment ("bad barrel") antecedents of unethical choice. Findings provide empirical support for several foundational theories and paint a cleare… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

45
1,088
8
23

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,338 publications
(1,164 citation statements)
references
References 293 publications
45
1,088
8
23
Order By: Relevance
“…However, business ethics research findings of gender differences in ethical awareness and behavior are mixed (Kish-Gephart et al, 2010). While some empirical studies have found evidence that women are more ethical than men or more sensitive to the presence of ethical issues (Betz et al, 1989;Dawson, 1997), other research has found no differences (Kish-Gephart et al, 2010).…”
Section: Gendermentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, business ethics research findings of gender differences in ethical awareness and behavior are mixed (Kish-Gephart et al, 2010). While some empirical studies have found evidence that women are more ethical than men or more sensitive to the presence of ethical issues (Betz et al, 1989;Dawson, 1997), other research has found no differences (Kish-Gephart et al, 2010).…”
Section: Gendermentioning
confidence: 96%
“…For instance, only moral identity internalization (not symbolization) predicted actual donations (Aquino & Reed, 2002). Because gender differences in ethical behavior (not only ethical intentions) do emerge (Kish-Gephart et al, 2010), the internalization construct is more theoretically relevant than is the symbolization construct.…”
Section: A Social-cognitive Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Dreber and Johannesson (2008) explored deceptive behavior via an economic game (the ''Deception Game") and found that only 38% of women lied to secure a monetary benefit, relative to 55% of men. In a meta-analysis, Kish-Gephart, Harrison, and Trevino (2010) found gender differences to emerge not only for ethical intentions, but also for ethical behavior.…”
Section: Outside the Negotiation Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this current setting, the intention to report is central to the error management climate within the organisation as Van Dyck et al (2005) state that communication about errors constitutes the most important error management practice. The three antecedents correspond closely with the idea that actions and responses are the result of the interaction between the individual and the situational (Trevino 1986) and that behaviour within organisations is at least in some way influenced by an amalgamation of individual morality, collective moral emotion and work climate (Kish-Gephart et al 2010). …”
Section: Module 2: the Intention To Report Operational Risk Events Sumentioning
confidence: 99%