2004
DOI: 10.29091/kratylos/2004/1/1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Baltoslavisch. I. Teil: Phonologie

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As Olander (2015: 24) aptly put it: "By tracing back the identical developments in the two branches to a common ancestor we obtain the simplest model of the relationship between Baltic and Slavic, without a notable loss of explanatory power". Recent overviews of the shared Baltic and Slavic features that are relevant for the Balto-Slavic question can be found in Hock (2004Hock ( , 2005, Euler (2007: 10-15), Young (2017), Petit (2018) and Villanueva Svensson (in press). Excellent general overviews of the scholarly literature have been given by Petit (2004), Hock (2006) and Dini (2014: 200-13).…”
Section: Archaisms Shared With Anatolian (But Not Greek)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Olander (2015: 24) aptly put it: "By tracing back the identical developments in the two branches to a common ancestor we obtain the simplest model of the relationship between Baltic and Slavic, without a notable loss of explanatory power". Recent overviews of the shared Baltic and Slavic features that are relevant for the Balto-Slavic question can be found in Hock (2004Hock ( , 2005, Euler (2007: 10-15), Young (2017), Petit (2018) and Villanueva Svensson (in press). Excellent general overviews of the scholarly literature have been given by Petit (2004), Hock (2006) and Dini (2014: 200-13).…”
Section: Archaisms Shared With Anatolian (But Not Greek)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent overviews of the shared Baltic and Slavic features that are relevant for the Balto-Slavic question can be found in Hock (2004Hock ( , 2005, Euler (2007: 10-15), Young (2017), Petit (2018) and Villanueva Svensson (in press). Excellent general overviews of the scholarly literature have been given by Petit (2004), Hock (2006) and Dini (2014: 200-13).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Details are available in the histories of the question (Safarewicz 1945;Szemerényi 1948;Toporov 1958ab, 1962Bogoljubova and Jakubaitis 1959;Meriggi 1965;Karaliūnas 1968;Dini 2014b: 204−216), in the huge number of specific contributions on this subject (e.g. Endzelīns 1911;Brückner 1914;Otrębski 1949Otrębski , 1954Gornung 1959;Devoto 1962: 352−359;Shevelov 1964: 613−614; Birnbaum 1970, 1975: 223−228 and315−338;Schmid 1976a;Martynov 1982;Trubačëv 1982;Birnbaum and Merrill 1983: 61−64;Inoue 1986;Schenker 1995: 70 f.; Hock 2004Hock , 2005Hock , 2006; Anikin 2014), and in specialized bibliographies (e.g. Szemerényi 1957;Hood 1967;Zav'jalova and Civ'jan 2014).…”
Section: Introductory Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%