2001
DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2001.tb03636.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

BANKFULL DISCHARGE RECURRENCE INTERVALS AND REGIONAL HYDRAULIC GEOMETRY RELATIONSHIPS: PATTERNS IN THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST, USA1

Abstract: The model bankfull discharge recurrence interval (annual series) (Ta) in streams has been approximated at a 1.5‐year flow event. This study tests the linkage between regional factors (climate, physiography, and ecoregion) and the frequency of bank‐full discharge events in the Pacific Northwest (PNW). Patterns of Ta were found to be significant when stratified by EPA Ecoregion. The mean value for Ta in the PNW is 1.4 years; however, when the data is stratified by ecoregion, the humid areas of western Oregon and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
180
1
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 190 publications
(194 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
12
180
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Peak streamflows with a 66.7-percent annual exceedance probability (AEP) (1.5-year recurrence interval) generally are considered representative of bankfull conditions (Leopold, 1994;Hortness and Berenbrock, 2004). Similarly, Castro and Jackson (2001) completed a regional study and determined that the average AEP for bankfull streamflows in rivers in the Pacific Northwest states (Oregon, Washington, and Idaho) is 71.4 percent (1.4-year recurrence interval). Castro and Jackson (2001) suggested a 66.7-percent AEP (1.5-year recurrence interval) for use in Idaho.…”
Section: Rationale For Selected Streamflow Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Peak streamflows with a 66.7-percent annual exceedance probability (AEP) (1.5-year recurrence interval) generally are considered representative of bankfull conditions (Leopold, 1994;Hortness and Berenbrock, 2004). Similarly, Castro and Jackson (2001) completed a regional study and determined that the average AEP for bankfull streamflows in rivers in the Pacific Northwest states (Oregon, Washington, and Idaho) is 71.4 percent (1.4-year recurrence interval). Castro and Jackson (2001) suggested a 66.7-percent AEP (1.5-year recurrence interval) for use in Idaho.…”
Section: Rationale For Selected Streamflow Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Castro and Jackson (2001) completed a regional study and determined that the average AEP for bankfull streamflows in rivers in the Pacific Northwest states (Oregon, Washington, and Idaho) is 71.4 percent (1.4-year recurrence interval). Castro and Jackson (2001) suggested a 66.7-percent AEP (1.5-year recurrence interval) for use in Idaho. A streamflow with a 66.7-percent AEP has a 66.7 percent chance of occurring at any time in any given year.…”
Section: Rationale For Selected Streamflow Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At higher return periods, conveyance rather than storage is likely to be the dominant influence and flood peaks will tend to be transferred downstream with less attenuation. Given that many bankfull recurrence intervals are in the order of 1-3 yr (see for example Richards, 1982;Petit and Paquet, 1997;Castro and Jackson, 2001) and that mean and median annual flows have return periods of 2.33 (assuming GEV type I distributions) and 2 yr respectively, flows in natural channels can frequently be subjected to a combination of these complex storage and attenuation effects.…”
Section: Hydrological and Hydraulic Influencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, considerable resources are being expended by state and federal agencies as well as by academic institutions to determine bankfull channel dimensions and regional curves (based on channel and basin characteristics) to predict the bankfull discharge (eg. Harman et al, 1999;Odem et al, 1999;Castro and Jackson, 2001). Although data collection efforts are applauded, the overriding emphasis on determining bankfull dimensions at the expense of other data-collection programs that is troubling (ie.…”
Section: Why Not Collect Data That Can Be Used To Analyze Channel Promentioning
confidence: 99%