2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jflm.2018.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bare footprint metric analysis methods for comparison and identification in forensic examinations: A review of literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method of stature estimation can be used by law enforcement agencies and forensic scientists. The only precaution which should be taken into account is that these formulas are applicable to the population from which the data has been collected since inherent population variations exist in these dimensions, (Mukhra et al, 2018) which may be attributed to genetic and other environmental factors such as climate, nutrition etc. Based on this reasoning, a prerequisite is a regular adequate control of facts (Popovic), as there are evident expectation based on the European sample (Fredriks et al, 2005), which forsee secular changes in stature in the following decades; therefore, all current assumptions are questionable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method of stature estimation can be used by law enforcement agencies and forensic scientists. The only precaution which should be taken into account is that these formulas are applicable to the population from which the data has been collected since inherent population variations exist in these dimensions, (Mukhra et al, 2018) which may be attributed to genetic and other environmental factors such as climate, nutrition etc. Based on this reasoning, a prerequisite is a regular adequate control of facts (Popovic), as there are evident expectation based on the European sample (Fredriks et al, 2005), which forsee secular changes in stature in the following decades; therefore, all current assumptions are questionable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Overlay method [1][2][3]5,10,16,31,[89][90][91] is an entirely different approach for analysing footprints. Instead of drawing lines between defined landmarks of the footprint to measure specific quantitative dimensions, the method instead relies on the tracing of the outline of footprints along with any features in the bare footprint such as crease marks, scars or fine outline detail ( Figure 6).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…53 In this regard, research has been undertaken to ascertain method validity of the linear measurement methods used in footprint examination, which has been systematically reviewed. 2,93 Reel's work on considering the validity and reliability of the other linear measurement methods demonstrated that the Optical Centre method has lower levels of reliability. 55 This was identified when the method was subjected to repeat measurement testing and compared with other approaches, particularly using more rigorous statistical methods such as 95% LOA and 95% SEM which measure absolute reliability as opposed to, for example, the ICC which measure relative reliability.…”
Section: Dovepressmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The sexing of footprints has primarily proceeded by comparison of linear dimensions (e.g., [16][17][18][19][20][21]) and to a lesser extent via shape metrics (e.g., [22,23]). There is a known sex difference in the density of friction ridges on human fingers [24] which has been translated to feet in recent studies (e.g., [25][26][27]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%