Barriers Affecting Effective Application of Anticorruption Measures in Infrastructure Projects: Disparities between Developed and Developing Countries

Abstract

This study examines the critical barriers that obstruct the full potency and the intended effectiveness of anti-corruption measures enforced to mitigate the pervasiveness of corrupt practices in project procurement and execution. To achieve this aim, a comprehensive review of literature was conducted and resulted in the identification of 17 critical barriers. A questionnaire survey was conducted with 65 experts from around the world involved in infrastructure project procurement and management using the purposive sampling technique. The analysis was conducted on a contextual comparative basis. Thus, comparing the views of experts from the developed countries against the experts from the developing countries. The leading barriers identified by the respondents from the developing context were; the absence of political will by government officers, and statutory professional councils to fight corruption and personal attitudes which include the lack of will to become involved in fighting corruption. The respondents from the developed world revealed that, non-familiarity with ethical codes, the fear of being caught reporting and personal attitude were the leading barriers. The Mann-Whitney U test was employed to analyze the statistical difference regarding the barriers' criticality between the two contexts. This study contributes to a deepened understanding of corruption by examining the criticalities of barriers to the effectiveness of anti-corruption measures which have not received the needed attention in the past years. The study also reveals that the prevalence of corruption in infrastructure projects are not attributed to the causes and vulnerabilities only, but also the identified barriers. As this study informs policymakers, anti-corruption institutions, academic and industrial researchers on the barriers that are This is the Pre-Published Version.

Exploring the “Energy-Saving Personality Traits” in the Office and Household Situation: An Empirical Study

“…Based on an extensive review of the relevant literature [6,52,53], the questionnaire survey was chosen as the main data instrument to solicit the opinions on the subject matter. In order to encourage participation, the questionnaire was completely anonymous and voluntary, respondents were assured of the confidentiality of their data [54]. No reminder letter was sent to the respondents during the data collection process.…”

A Demand-Side Approach for Linking the Past to Future Urban–Rural Development

“…We have the questionnaire interpreted into French, Russian, Arabic, Portuguese, Spanish, Italian, Indonesian, and Chinese. (Kingsford & Chan, 2019). The Cronbach's alpha reliability test (Likert scale bigger than 0.7) justified that the chosen scale was suitable, the data collection instrument was strongly reliable, and the responses were consistent with the survey (Shen, Lu, Peng, & Jiang, 2011;SPSS, 2006).…”

The ecosystem of drivers for electronic procurement adoption for construction project procurement

“…Studies by Santoso and Bourpanus (2018) and Liao et al (2002), showed that one motivation for organizations to adopt e-procurement was to reduce bid collusion and corrupt practices. The procurement process in the construction and engineering sector is highly vulnerable to corrupt practices (Transparency International, 2005; Owusu and Chan, 2018), hence organizations employ e-procurement to curb these corrupt practices. Increase competition among contractors/suppliers is an additional driver that motivates organizations to adopt e-procurement for projects.…”