Barriers and facilitators to community‐based psycho‐oncology services: A qualitative study of health professionals’ attitudes to the feasibility and acceptability of a shared care model

Abstract

Objective: Psychological therapies combined with medication are effective treatments for depression and anxiety in patients with cancer. However, the psychooncology workforce is insufficient to meet patient need and is hard to access outside of the major cities. To bridge this gap, innovative models of care are required. Implementation of a new model of care requires attention to the facilitators and barriers.The aim of this study was to explore stakeholders' attitudes to the feasibility and acceptability of a community-based, shared care model for the treatment of depression and anxiety.Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with community-based clinical psychologists (n = 10), general practitioners (n = 6), and hospital-based psychologists working in psycho-oncology (n = 9). Framework analysis was conducted to identify key themes. Results: All stakeholders perceived the model as feasible and acceptable. Potential barriers/facilitators to implementation were summarised under six key themes: (a) initiative, ownership, and autonomy; (b) resources; (c) pathway establishment; (d) support; (e) skill acquisition; and (f) patient engagement. Facilitators included quality communication between health professionals across primary and tertiary care and appropriate education and support for community-based clinicians. Conclusions: This in-depth exploration of Australian health professionals' perceptions of the feasibility and acceptability of a community-based model of psychooncology care revealed that most clinicians were willing to adopt the proposed changes into practice. An RCT of a shared care intervention for depressed patients with cancer is needed.

Quality of Nursing Care in Saudi Arabia: Are Empathy, Advocacy, and Caring Important Attributes for Nurses?

“…For durable interaction, empathy is necessary between patients and nurses (Usta, Demir, & Yagmuroglu, 2012). Enhancement in empathic skills offers practical communication skills for nurses (Vaccaro et al, 2019). This study's findings indicated that there might be deleterious effects of being overly sensitive to others' pain and suffering, even though empathy is a fundamental aspect of nurse-patient interaction.…”

The patient as a prosumer of healthcare: insights from a bibliometric-interpretive review

“…Three organizational interventions are required to accomplish these two aims. First, a systemic approach to design comprehensive healthcare paths should be undertaken, enabling patients to be continuously engaged as prosumers in healthcare service co-production and overcoming gaps in the continuum of care that are prejudicial to patient engagement (Vaccaro et al. , 2019).…”

“…Three organizational interventions are required to accomplish these two aims. First, a systemic approach to design comprehensive healthcare paths should be undertaken, enabling patients to be continuously engaged as prosumers in healthcare service coproduction and overcoming gaps in the continuum of care that are prejudicial to patient engagement (Vaccaro et al, 2019). Second, healthcare professionals should be trained to involve patients as prosumers in value co-creation, increasing the individual and collective awareness of the gains that are heralded by service co-production and value co-creation (Batalden et al, 2016).…”

Cancer Survivors, Oncology, and Primary Care Perspectives on Survivorship Care: An Integrative Review

“…The model also leverages supportive care expertise (ie, dietitians, rehabilitation, psychology/psychiatry) for a more comprehensive survivorship care approach. 49 , 50 Evidence from other countries suggests that in breast cancer survivors, the shared care approach improved receipt of timely follow-up screening, decreased waiting time to receive oncology care, and freed up clinician time by shifting resources to survivors with more complex needs. 51 Implementation of the self-management shared care model will likely be more complex in the United States due to diverse care delivery systems, and more evidence is needed on its effectiveness in the United States healthcare system.…”