Barriers and Recommendations to Innovative Ownership Models for Wind Power

Abstract

Local ownership models have proven to be an important way to avoid local resistance to onshore wind turbines. As wind power expands into onshore and nearshore wind farms, such ownership models become of increasing importance, while also undergoing further development. This paper uses the Choice Awareness theory to examine some of the barriers connected to the implementation of these new ownership models and presents recommendations to overcome such barriers. Choice Awareness addresses societal aspects (discourse, socioeconomics, and public regulation) mainly related to implementing alternatives to existing technologies. For the theory to be able to embrace the complexity of the transition of the energy system more holistically, we explore and specify the organizational dimension of choice-eliminating mechanisms. Based on the case of an NGO’s attempt to bid for a tender for nearshore wind turbines, it is shown how the central administration prevents new innovative ownership models from entering the tender. A strong path dependency has led to a conscious or unconscious elimination of projects based on organizational structures that do not fit the definition of large energy companies. As a result of this, the paper makes three recommendations for policy changes with the aim to secure equal possibilities for actors involved in nearshore wind power tenders.

Climate-friendly but socially rejected energy-transition pathways: The integration of techno-economic and socio-technical approaches in the Nordic-Baltic region

“…The concept of energy citizenship could be part of such an approach, as it can facilitate citizens' engagement in energy projects based on trust and notions of justice [37,90]. Along these same lines, it has been argued that community energy initiatives and shared ownership models could receive higher levels of public support [91].…”

News Media Framing of Grassroots Innovations in Denmark, the Netherlands and Sweden

“…They cover roughly 36% of the total DH supply of the country. There are 28 biogas-centered farmer cooperatives, 21 local energy offices and other energy-related NGOs and folk high schools, and eight eco-villages with an explicit focus on RE or energy efficiency (Krog et al, 2018).…”

Local Economic Impact of Wind Energy Development: Analysis of the Regulatory Framework, Taxation, and Income for Galician Municipalities

“…Certainly, the scope of the local economic impacts of wind energy is limited by the public policies regulating wind power activity [39]. For instance, in Denmark, 20% of the ownership of a wind farm is offered to the public in the form of shares at a cost price, which is a norm that fosters the increase of local revenues [40,41]. In France, a specific wind tax has been created for the purpose of granting municipalities the possibility of participating in the income generated by wind farms [42].…”