Barriers to Eye Care Faced by Adult Hispanics With Diabetes

Griffin-Shirley, Nora; Trusty, Sharon; Kelley, Pat; Siew-Jin, Lai; Macias, Eduardo

doi:10.3200/revu.36.2.53-62

Cited by 7 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…A recommendation by the HCP to attend screening was an enabler [30,31], and having received a recommendation from a healthcare provider to attend screening was associated with attendance [32][33][34]. The absence of an HCP recommendation was a barrier in other studies [35][36][37][38]. Some people with diabetes reported lack of information provision from their healthcare providers [27,30,39], especially at the point of diagnosis.…”

Section: Social Influences (35 Studies)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Barriers to and enablers of diabetic retinopathy screening attendance: a systematic review of published and grey literature

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Social Influences (35 Studies)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Barriers to and enablers of diabetic retinopathy screening attendance: a systematic review of published and grey literature

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Report Supplementary Material 2 [see Characteristics of the 65 included studies (phase 2 review)] shows the characteristics of the 65 included studies. Forty-one (63%) 147,148,150,151,153,156,[162][163][164][165][166]171,[175][176][177][178][179][180]182,[184][185][186][187]190,192,[194][195][196][197][198][199][201][202][203][204][205][206][207][208][209][210] used quantitative methods only (e.g. questionnaires, surveys), 18 (28%) 149,152,154,155,[157][158][159][160]...…”

Section: Characteristics Of Included Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The quality appraisals of the included studies (n = 53 24,[147][148][149][150][151][152][153][154][155][156][157][158][159][160][161][163][164][165][166][167][168][169][170][172][173][174][175][177][178][179][180]182,184,185,187,[190][191][192]194,195,197,199,[201][202][203][204][205][206][207][208]…”

Section: Quality Of Included Studiesunclassified

“…On the basis of expressed importance, domains judged to be important in the included studies were 'environmental context and resources' (19 studies 148,152,154,155,158,160,161,166,170,179,[185][186][187]189,191,194,199,201,207 ), 'knowledge' (19 studies 152,[158][159][160][161]165,[167][168][169][173][174][175]181,190,191,193,195,200,205 ), 'memory, attention and decision processes' (11 studies 156,166,170,[179][180][181][182]187,189,193,…”

Section: Expressed Importancementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

What works to increase attendance for diabetic retinopathy screening? An evidence synthesis and economic analysis

Lawrenson

Graham-Rowe

Lorencatto

et al. 2018

Health Technol Assess

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The primary barriers reported for not adhering to the annual DFE recommendations were that they were "Too busy" and "Unable to afford the co-pay." Previous studies have reported that cost is a barrier to obtaining a DFE [18,19]. Minimizing the cost barrier may provide an avenue to increase adherence in obtaining a DFE.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessing Adherence to Annual Dilated Eye Exam Recommendations in Patients with Diabetes and Erectile Dysfunction

Greenberg¹,

Hark²,

Hübert³

et al. 2015

J Clin Res Ophthalmol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aims: This prospective, observational, pilot study assessed adherence rates of annual dilated fundus examinations (DFEs) among patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and erectile dysfunction (ED) in a university-based practice and identified predictors associated with DFE adherence. Methods: A total of 56 men who had been diagnosed with ED and type I or type II DM were enrolled in the study and given a 24-question survey assessing their knowledge of DFE recommendations and ocular history. Patients were classified as adherent (n=39) or non-adherent (n=17) to the annual DFE. The differences in demographics, baseline characteristics, and survey responses between the adherent and non-adherent groups were analyzed using Fisher's exact test for the comparison of proportions and Student's t-test for the comparison of means. Results: The adherent group was more likely than the non-adherent group to be seeing an eye doctor (p=0.03). The most common cited reasons for not seeing an ophthalmologist were "Too busy" (n=5) and "Unable to pay the co-pay" (n=4). Conclusions: Patients with ED and DM showed a greater adherence to annual DFE recommendations than those in the reported non-ED population. Minimizing the cost barrier and educating about diabetes complications may increase adherence in obtaining a DFE.

show abstract

Barriers to Eye Care Faced by Adult Hispanics With Diabetes

Cited by 7 publications

References 20 publications

Barriers to and enablers of diabetic retinopathy screening attendance: a systematic review of published and grey literature

Barriers to and enablers of diabetic retinopathy screening attendance: a systematic review of published and grey literature

What works to increase attendance for diabetic retinopathy screening? An evidence synthesis and economic analysis

Assessing Adherence to Annual Dilated Eye Exam Recommendations in Patients with Diabetes and Erectile Dysfunction

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About