2020
DOI: 10.1007/s12355-020-00889-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Barriers to ICT Usage: An Assessment Among the Sugarcane Farmers in Disadvantaged Districts of Tamil Nadu, India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such technological barriers were also found in a survey conducted with 240 Indian sugarcane farmers, in which only 18% of the rural population have access to the internet [126]. In addition, they highlighted the lack of time, educational access and elevated production costs [127].…”
Section: Technological Implementationmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such technological barriers were also found in a survey conducted with 240 Indian sugarcane farmers, in which only 18% of the rural population have access to the internet [126]. In addition, they highlighted the lack of time, educational access and elevated production costs [127].…”
Section: Technological Implementationmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Despite the above issues, there is another barrier related to the technological adoption in agriculture that must be overcome, namely internet access. Thus, government political actions to promote internet and electrical access, as well as tailored crop extension aid to increase farmers' digital trust, are needed [127].…”
Section: Technological Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various explanatory variables were selected to estimate the predicted values of the outcome variable. The choice of variables was based on the studies (Prathap et al ., 2021; Qui et al ., 2021; Ahmad et al ., 2021; Okello et al ., 2020). The description of variables included in the ordinal logistic regression model and their level of measurement are presented in Table 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%