Based on outcomes? Challenges and (missed) opportunities of measuring social outcomes in outcome-based contracting

Pieri, Benedetta De; Chiodo, Veronica; Gerli, Francesco

doi:10.1080/10967494.2022.2077490

Cited by 6 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 64 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…As a result, the study relied on descriptive statistics without a counterfactual assessment. Similar to the findings of Fox and Morris 40 and De Pieri et al 41 . regarding SIBs, LCF evaluation are also funded by government departments.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 60%

“… difficulties with implementation, measurement, and evaluation: Without any economic evaluation, return on investment analysis and the disclosed full costs of implementation, the financial value of HIBs over traditional sources of funding cannot be verified. This issue is repeated over and over in many studies on SIBs (e.g 7,23,38–41 …”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 97%

“…However, lack of robust evaluation methods has been cited as a shortcoming in SIBs 19,27,32 . The root of the issue is with the lack of rigor in choosing and measuring outcome metrics, 41 lack of counterfactual with similar outcomes to allow comparability, 40 and lack of data availability 34 . Apart from lack of information on impact attribution and SIBs comparability, there is also not much known about the economic validity of SIBs.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Seeking outcomes under tight budgets: A case for health impact bonds in Post‐COVID times

Shiva

2023

Health Planning & Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

With global public debt at record levels, governments are facing unprecedented challenges in providing essential health services. This exploratory study aims to assess the relevance of Health Impact Bonds (HIBs) as a means of financing preventative health services during times of fiscal constraint and in the aftermath of the COVID pandemic. The study draws on a review of the literature on HIBs, along with a case study analysis of HIBs implemented in the UK. The findings of the study indicate that, although HIBs offer promise as an innovative funding tool for preventative health services in tight fiscal situations, certain challenges are limiting their broader adoption.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 60%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 97%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Seeking outcomes under tight budgets: A case for health impact bonds in Post‐COVID times

Shiva

2023

Health Planning & Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Reflecting the increasing focus on supply chain management, various studies have been examining the significant effects of integrating innovation within the supply chain, particularly on diverse stakeholder groups. These analyses highlight the extensive influence that innovative practices in supply chain management can have across different stakeholders (De Pieri et al ., 2023; Lii and Kuo, 2016).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Innovating the management of supply chains for social sustainability: from the state of the art to an integrated framework

Zangara,

Filice

2024

EJIM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThis paper focuses on managerial practices in the context of supply chain. It focuses on the innovation of monitoring and control practices and proposes a holistic approach to managing social sustainability in the supply chain, extending the point of view beyond the traditional boundaries of individual factories or their immediate suppliers.Design/methodology/approachThe analysis is based on a systematic review of scientific literature on managerial practices in supply chains, with a specific focus on social sustainability. The primary goal is to identify essential measurement strategies and key indicator factors within this domain.FindingsOur findings highlight that most of scientific literature focuses on qualitative approaches, though quantitative approaches are also used. Despite the extensive research, an under-investigated area is the use of hybrid models for measuring social sustainability in the supply chain.Social implicationsThis framework is designed to identify the main categories of measurement and relative indicators for assessing social sustainability in supply chains.Originality/valueThis research proposes an innovative and integrated framework, leveraging a hybrid approach that addresses the limitations observed in existing management practices. Additionally, it provides directions for future research.

show abstract

Social Sustainability in Production Systems: an exploration along the supply chain

Zangara,

Corvello,

Filice

2024

Procedia CIRP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Based on outcomes? Challenges and (missed) opportunities of measuring social outcomes in outcome-based contracting

Cited by 6 publications

References 64 publications

Seeking outcomes under tight budgets: A case for health impact bonds in Post‐COVID times

Seeking outcomes under tight budgets: A case for health impact bonds in Post‐COVID times

Innovating the management of supply chains for social sustainability: from the state of the art to an integrated framework

Social Sustainability in Production Systems: an exploration along the supply chain

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About