2007
DOI: 10.1346/ccmn.2007.0550508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Baseline studies of the clay minerals society special clays: Specific surface area by the Brunauer Emmett Teller (BET) method

Abstract: The Clay Minerals Society published a complete characterization scheme for its ‘Source Clays’ but not for its ‘Special Clays’. To address this issue, the specific surface areas (SSAs) of the 16 special clays from The Clay Minerals Society were determined using the Brunauer, Emmett and Teller (BET) method of adsorption of an inert gas. Two BET measurements were performed for each of the 16 special clays, and the average BET SSA of each of the special clays was determined. The BET SSA of cookeite is reported for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
34
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
6
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The BET surface areas for Ca-and Na-montmorillonite measured in this study are credible based on comparison with the BET surface areas (24.7-97 m 2 /g) of montmorillonite previously measured [11,[69][70][71][72][73]. For illite and kaolinite, the BET surface areas (19.738 m 2 /g and 12.271 m 2 /g, respectively) decrease progressively but are larger than that of illite (17.5 m 2 /g) [74] and kaolinite (13.0 m 2 /g) [44]. Ripidolite (4.922 m 2 /g) has a slightly higher specific surface area than cookeite (3.242 m 2 /g) and is similar to chlorite with an A BET of 4.8 m 2 /g as measured by Ross and Bustin [72].…”
Section: Microscopic Parameters Of Pores In Clay Mineralssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The BET surface areas for Ca-and Na-montmorillonite measured in this study are credible based on comparison with the BET surface areas (24.7-97 m 2 /g) of montmorillonite previously measured [11,[69][70][71][72][73]. For illite and kaolinite, the BET surface areas (19.738 m 2 /g and 12.271 m 2 /g, respectively) decrease progressively but are larger than that of illite (17.5 m 2 /g) [74] and kaolinite (13.0 m 2 /g) [44]. Ripidolite (4.922 m 2 /g) has a slightly higher specific surface area than cookeite (3.242 m 2 /g) and is similar to chlorite with an A BET of 4.8 m 2 /g as measured by Ross and Bustin [72].…”
Section: Microscopic Parameters Of Pores In Clay Mineralssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The surface areas were calculated using the BET method [26], considering the model of a multilayer coverage. The Br-Hec has a surface area of 385 m 2 g −1 , while the I-Hec gives the area of 363 m 2 g −1 , which are higher than those described in the literature for synthetic hectorites (5 to 300 m 2 g −1 ) [39], but similar to those reported for Laponite ® (between 279 and 375 m 2 g −1 ) [39,40].…”
Section: Porosity Packing and Thermal Stabilitysupporting
confidence: 75%
“…However, the SSA could assume very different values even among clays. The SSAs of different clays, reported by Dogan et al (2007), ranged from\1 to[100 m 2 /g, depending on the mineral structure. The highest values of [100 m 2 /g were found for synthetic clays, while the usual values for natural montmorillonite and illite were 39.5-65.4 and 17.7-20.4 m 2 /g, respectively.…”
Section: Physico-chemical Characteristics Of the Morinje Bay Peloidsmentioning
confidence: 99%