2011
DOI: 10.17487/rfc6076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Basic Telephony SIP End-to-End Performance Metrics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Now considering this issue, through appropriate selection of Transmission protocol and also by selecting UDP as Transmission layer protocol, by regulating SIP Timers, we can provide conditions to increase the protocol effectiveness, in various network conditions and through considering the amount of Packet loss and Delay and the amount of Traffic load of SIP. As the session initiator can determine the Transmission protocol and the responder complies with him and making decision for this selection is done in each Nod of the SIP network [6], therefore, we can take measures in each point of the network considering the network conditions for selection [7][8][9]. In this case, the selection is done dynamically and without spending certain expense we can increase the transmission and as a result, the high efficiency [10,11].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now considering this issue, through appropriate selection of Transmission protocol and also by selecting UDP as Transmission layer protocol, by regulating SIP Timers, we can provide conditions to increase the protocol effectiveness, in various network conditions and through considering the amount of Packet loss and Delay and the amount of Traffic load of SIP. As the session initiator can determine the Transmission protocol and the responder complies with him and making decision for this selection is done in each Nod of the SIP network [6], therefore, we can take measures in each point of the network considering the network conditions for selection [7][8][9]. In this case, the selection is done dynamically and without spending certain expense we can increase the transmission and as a result, the high efficiency [10,11].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SIP protocol and SIP retransmission timers are defined in RFC 3261 [1], whereas SIP performance metrics for registration request delay are standardized in RFC 6076 [8]. C. Egger et.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using metrics from [8], nearly 99% of all "401 Unauthorized" responses are sent within 1 ms and 98% of all "200 OK" within 2 ms of registration request arrival. Both values are well below the SIP retransmission timer T1 value of 500 ms, such that SIP server delay can be excluded as reason for timer T1 expiry.…”
Section: Sip Registrar Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Very little research work is done in the area of performance modelling of SIP proxy servers. Recently, lot of IP telephony industries is focusing on various SIP and SIP proxy performance metrics [17]. Rajagopal et al [11] analysed and proposed the IP Multimedia Services (IMS) network based on the SIP signalling delay and predicted performance trends of the network, which allowed them to choose parameter values optimally.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SIP Registrar server is a network server which accepts/stores/serves registration requests and may interface with location services such as Light Weight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP), Common Object Request Broker Architecture (CORBA) and Open Database Connectivity (ODBC) database servers [9]. SIP proxy server accepts the session request sent by SIP UA, and queries the SIP registrar server to obtain the recipient UA's addressing and routing information [17]. SIP proxy server then forwards the session invitation directly to the recipient SIP UA if it is in the same domain or to another proxy server if the UA resides in a different domain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%