2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.04.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

BDNF Val66Met polymorphism and hippocampal volume in neuropsychiatric disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: This meta-analysis suggests that there is no association between this BDNF polymorphism and hippocampal volumes. For each BDNF genotype, the hippocampal volumes were significantly lower in neuropsychiatric patients than in healthy controls.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
71
4
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
4
71
4
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This polymorphism affects the activity-dependent secretion of BDNF (Egan et al 2003). Although at first, a negative association between the val66met polymorphism and hippocampal volume has been reported (Frodl et al 2007), this observation was not supported by a meta-analysis that did not evidence any association between hippocampal volume and the val66met genotype in neuropsychiatric patients, perhaps because of the too many different disorders analyzed in this study (Harrisberger et al 2015). Yet again, several other meta-analyses did confirm the association between the val66met polymorphism and an increased susceptibility to mood disorders (Hosang et al 2014; Li et al 2016; Yan et al 2014; Zou et al 2010).…”
Section: Neurotrophins and Other Growth Factorscontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…This polymorphism affects the activity-dependent secretion of BDNF (Egan et al 2003). Although at first, a negative association between the val66met polymorphism and hippocampal volume has been reported (Frodl et al 2007), this observation was not supported by a meta-analysis that did not evidence any association between hippocampal volume and the val66met genotype in neuropsychiatric patients, perhaps because of the too many different disorders analyzed in this study (Harrisberger et al 2015). Yet again, several other meta-analyses did confirm the association between the val66met polymorphism and an increased susceptibility to mood disorders (Hosang et al 2014; Li et al 2016; Yan et al 2014; Zou et al 2010).…”
Section: Neurotrophins and Other Growth Factorscontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…These observations were confirmed in three meta-analytic reviews (Hajek et al 2012, Kambeitz et al 2012, Molendijk et al 2012. However, the most recent meta-analyses showed no association between Val66Met polymorphism and hippocampal volumes neither in healthy subjects nor clinical groups (Harrisberger et al 2014(Harrisberger et al , 2015. The authors suggest that inconsistency of the results may be related to measuring techniques and sample sizes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Rodents have natural inheritance to explore and interact with novel conspecifics versus familiar conspecifics, presumably due to their intact social memory. The social recognition or social memory is measured by the amount of time the subject spend with a novel conspecific versus a familiar conspecific [17][18][19][20]. Thus, in both assays wild type subjects tend to spend more time in the chamber with a novel conspecific.…”
Section: Manifestation and Assessment Of Social Dysfunctions In Animamentioning
confidence: 99%