Proceedings of the 9th Int. Particle Accelerator Conf. 2018
DOI: 10.18429/jacow-ipac2018-tupaf040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beam Loss Measurements for Recurring Fast Loss Events During 2017 LHC Operation Possibly Caused by Macroparticles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The collision vertex can therefore be determined empirically by finding the best match between measured and simulated patterns. This method already proved to be successful for localizing the aforementioned obstacle in the dispersion suppressor [24] as well as the location of accidental air inflow in one of the arc cells [27]. The same approach was also used in run I for estimating the location of dust events at 3.5 TeV and 4 TeV in a specific arc cell equipped with additional BLMs [40].…”
Section: B Methods For Reconstructing the Number Of Collisionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The collision vertex can therefore be determined empirically by finding the best match between measured and simulated patterns. This method already proved to be successful for localizing the aforementioned obstacle in the dispersion suppressor [24] as well as the location of accidental air inflow in one of the arc cells [27]. The same approach was also used in run I for estimating the location of dust events at 3.5 TeV and 4 TeV in a specific arc cell equipped with additional BLMs [40].…”
Section: B Methods For Reconstructing the Number Of Collisionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[40], by recording the energy deposition in the sensitive gas volume between the electrodes of the BLM model. The dust particles were assumed to be static and pointlike [27,40].…”
Section: B Methods For Reconstructing the Number Of Collisionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation