2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.05.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beef specific polymerase chain reaction assay for authentication of meat and meat products

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, awareness of food safety and quality has increased, and issues such as the adulteration of meat products have become critical in matters involving personal health, economy and religion (MANE et al, 2012a).Although, food adulteration has been reported by various researchers worldwide (MANE et al, 2012b;KARABASANAVARet al, 2013;MOUSAVI et al, 2015), few scientific studies have investigated the frequency of food adulteration in different Brazilian states. Furthermore, fast methods that may be routinely used to detect food adulteration are seldom described.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, awareness of food safety and quality has increased, and issues such as the adulteration of meat products have become critical in matters involving personal health, economy and religion (MANE et al, 2012a).Although, food adulteration has been reported by various researchers worldwide (MANE et al, 2012b;KARABASANAVARet al, 2013;MOUSAVI et al, 2015), few scientific studies have investigated the frequency of food adulteration in different Brazilian states. Furthermore, fast methods that may be routinely used to detect food adulteration are seldom described.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Karabasanavar et al (2011b) obtained 0.1% sensitivity for mutton with a 0.001 ng LOD. Mane et al (2012) detected less than 1% adulteration of beef in admixed meat and meat products. Thus, the LOD we obtained in this study was far below those of previously reported assays.…”
Section: Sensitivity Test Under Pure Admixed and Commercial Meatballsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In food adulteration studies, beef (Mane et al 2012), chicken (Mane et al 2009), turkey (Rodriguez et al 2003), goat (Karabasanavar et al 2011a), lamb and pork (Rodríguez et al 2004) among the livestock, and deer (Fajardo et al 2008) and wild boar (Mutalib et al 2012) among the wild animals have been extensively studied. However, to the best of our knowledge, no detection technique has been documented or articulated for MBT species detection under complex background and commercial foods.…”
Section: Sensitivity Test Under Pure Admixed and Commercial Meatballsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Species-specific PCR amplifies a very small amount of genetic target and has been accepted as conclusive for the detection of chicken (Haunshi et al 2009), goat , beef (Mane et al 2012), pork, and dog (Ali et al 2012d(Ali et al , 2013 in a simplex platform; pork and chicken in duplex PCR (Soares et al 2010); beef, chicken, and pork (Ghovvati et al 2009) in triplex, and cattle, pig, chicken, sheep, goat, and horse (Matsunaga et al 1999) in multiplex PCR systems. Multiplex PCR is theoretically interesting, but optimization of PCR conditions to detect multiple targets is really challenging ).…”
Section: Specificity Testmentioning
confidence: 99%