2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.05.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavior and design of slender circular tubed-reinforced-concrete columns subjected to eccentric compression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…e biggest error is in the comparison with literature [41,42], with Puf/ Put of 0.83. e probable reasons may be the following: differences between Chinese and American codes on the value of material strength, where American codes have higher reliability and safety; differences on the structure types, where literature [41,42] studied piers of bridges, while the FEM simulation in this paper was RC columns of buildings; and differences in time, where experiment in literature [41,42] was carried out in the early 1990s, with a history of nearly 30 years. Compared with literature [45,68,69], Puf/Put is between 0.89 and 0.98. e FEM simulation results are consistent with the experimental data, and the simulation results tend to be safer. e above analysis can fully prove the accuracy and applicability of the FEM model adopted in this paper.…”
Section: Validation Of Fem Modelmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…e biggest error is in the comparison with literature [41,42], with Puf/ Put of 0.83. e probable reasons may be the following: differences between Chinese and American codes on the value of material strength, where American codes have higher reliability and safety; differences on the structure types, where literature [41,42] studied piers of bridges, while the FEM simulation in this paper was RC columns of buildings; and differences in time, where experiment in literature [41,42] was carried out in the early 1990s, with a history of nearly 30 years. Compared with literature [45,68,69], Puf/Put is between 0.89 and 0.98. e FEM simulation results are consistent with the experimental data, and the simulation results tend to be safer. e above analysis can fully prove the accuracy and applicability of the FEM model adopted in this paper.…”
Section: Validation Of Fem Modelmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…In order to fully verify the accuracy and effectiveness of the proposed model, the FEM modeling method introduced in Section 4.2 is used to conduct modeling analysis on the samples in similar literature [41,42,45,68,69], and the analysis results are compared with the test data. e following is a brief introduction to the experimental overview of literature [41,42,45,68,69]:…”
Section: Validation Of Fem Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations