Behavioural alterations as part of an agricultural edge effect

Shanas, Uri; Shapira, Idan; Sultan, H.

doi:10.1111/j.1469-1795.2008.00161.x

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The constant arms race that takes place between predators and prey, and how it shapes community structure and behaviour has been matter of intense study and controversy (e.g. Blumstein 2008;Dickman 2008;Gompper & Vanak 2008;Shanas et al 2008;Shapira et al 2008). It is, however, widely accepted that adaptations are bidirectional and take place over at least two dimensions: spatial and temporal (Lima & Bednekoff 1999;Lima 2002).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Catch Me If You Can: Diel Activity Patterns of Mammalian Prey and Predators

2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The activity patterns exhibited by animals are shaped by evolution, but additionally fine‐tuned by flexible responses to the environment. Predation risk and resource availability are environmental cues which influence the behavioural decisions that make both predators and prey engage in activity bursts, and depending on their local importance, can be strong enough to override the endogenous regulation of an animals’ circadian clock. In Southern Europe, wherever the European rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) is abundant, it is the main prey of most mammalian mesopredators, and rodents are generally the alternative prey. We evaluated the bidirectional relation between the diel activity strategies of these mammalian mesopredators and prey coexisting in south‐western Europe. Results revealed that even though predation risk enforced by mammalian mesocarnivores during night‐time was approximately twice and five times higher than during twilight and daytime, respectively, murids consistently displayed unimodal nocturnal behaviour. Conversely, the European rabbits exhibited a bimodal pattern that peaked around sunrise and sunset. Despite the existence of some overlap between the diel rhythms of mesocarnivores and rabbits, their patterns were not synchronized. We suggest that the environmental stressors in our study areas are not severe enough to override the endogenous regulation of the circadian cycle in murids. European rabbits, however, are able to suppress their biological tendency for nocturnality by selecting a predominantly crepuscular pattern. In spite of the higher energetic input, mesocarnivores do not completely track rabbits’ activity pattern. They rather track rodents’ activity. We propose that these systems have probably evolved towards a situation where some degree of activity during high‐risk periods benefits the overall prey population survival, while the accessibility to sufficient prey prevents predators to completely track them.

show abstract