2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2009.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benchmarking the operating efficiency of Asia container ports

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
49
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with the finding ofHung, Lu, and Wang (2010), who reported a change in productivity in East Asian countries between 1985 and 2003. Their analysis showed that the scale elasticity was only 0.7933 on average, indicating that many countries in Asia Pacific have been experiencing diminishing scale efficiency levels.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…This is consistent with the finding ofHung, Lu, and Wang (2010), who reported a change in productivity in East Asian countries between 1985 and 2003. Their analysis showed that the scale elasticity was only 0.7933 on average, indicating that many countries in Asia Pacific have been experiencing diminishing scale efficiency levels.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Cullinane et al (2006) compared the results from DEA and SFA on port efficiencies and found high correlations between the results from the two approaches. In port literature, Hung, Lu, and Wang (2010) introduced scale efficiency into DEA analysis, and Sharma and Yu (2010) studied container terminals using the DEA model. Dowd and Leschine (1990) (1994) introduced the cross efficiency evaluation method to address the heterogeneity of DMUs.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, various techniques have been developed to permit the analysis of the influence of different factors contributing to the efficiency ranking, e.g. the Tobit model, or its special case, the recently created Simar-Wilson procedure with a truncated bootstrap regression [22], [23], [24].…”
Section: Use Of Non-parametric Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%