Milcom 2006 2006
DOI: 10.1109/milcom.2006.302006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benchmarks for DDOS Defense Evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DDoS defense includes typical benchmark suite [10] contains typical attack scenarios and comprehensive suite that influence defense's performance. It facilitates interaction of select feature instead of performing exhaustive testing in multidimensional space.…”
Section: Benchmarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DDoS defense includes typical benchmark suite [10] contains typical attack scenarios and comprehensive suite that influence defense's performance. It facilitates interaction of select feature instead of performing exhaustive testing in multidimensional space.…”
Section: Benchmarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While these are far from perfect, we believe they are a good first step towards improving DoS defense evaluation. Due to space constraints, we summarize our results here and refer readers to [7,8,10,12,15] for more details.…”
Section: Ddos Benchmark Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we summarize these efforts and their outcomes: a set of DoS defense benchmarks and a set of denial of service metrics. While our work on benchmarks and metrics has been extensively published [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15], this paper focuses on specific applications of this work to improve the quality of DoS evaluation. Our solutions are not the final answers in the quest for more scientific DoS defense evaluation, but they are useful steps toward that goal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DDoS mitigation techniques are plenty [7], [11], [13]. It ranges from simple packet dropping [6] to more sophisticated techniques [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%