Benefit from the minimally invasive sinus technique

Salama, N; Oakley, Richard; Skilbeck, Christopher J.; Choudhury, Natasha; Jacob, Antony

doi:10.1017/s0022215108002363

Cited by 21 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…1166,1167 In 1 prospectively studied cohort, 78.8% of CRS patients (including those with and without NPs) who underwent MIST maintained improvement in their baseline CSS scores 2 years after surgery. Only 5.9% of patients required revision MIST during that same period.…”

Section: Surgical Principles/techinques: Extent Of Surgerymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Only 5.9% of patients required revision MIST during that same period. 1166 Postoperative improvement in sinonasal symptoms were found to be greater in patients who underwent concomitant nasal polypectomy at time of MIST, 1167 calling into question the extent that MIST-specific sinus ventilation contributed to the observed clinical improvement.…”

Section: Surgical Principles/techinques: Extent Of Surgerymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Rhinosinusitis

Orlandi

Kingdom

Hwang

et al. 2016

Int Forum Allergy Rhinol

559

888

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background:The body of knowledge regarding rhinosinusitis (RS) continues to expand, with rapid growth in number of publications, yet substantial variability in the quality of those presentations. In an effort to both consolidate and critically appraise this information, rhinologic experts from around the world have produced the International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Rhinosinusitis (ICAR:RS). Methods:Evidence-based reviews with recommendations (EBRRs) were developed for scores of topics, using previously reported methodology. Where existing evidence was insufficient for an EBRR, an evidence-based review (EBR) was produced. The sections were then synthesized and the entire manuscript was then reviewed by all authors for consensus. Results:The resulting ICAR:RS document addresses multiple topics in RS, including acute RS (ARS), chronic RS (CRS) with and without nasal polyps (CRSwNP and CRSsNP), recurrent acute RS (RARS), acute exacerbation of CRS (AE-CRS), and pediatric RS. Conclusion:As a critical review of the RS literature, ICAR:RS provides a thorough review of pathophysiology and evidence-based recommendations for medical and surgical treatment. It also demonstrates the significant gaps in our understanding of the pathophysiology and optimal management of RS. Too o en the foundation upon which these recommendations are based is comprised of lowerlevel evidence. It is our hope that this summary of the evidence in RS will point out where additional research efforts may be directed. C 2016 ARS-AAOA, LLC. Key Words:rhinosinusitis; chronic rhinosinusitis; acute rhinosinusitis; recurrent acute rhinosinusitis; evidence-based medicine; systematic review; endoscopic sinus surgery List of Abbreviations Used

show abstract

Section: Surgical Principles/techinques: Extent Of Surgerymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Surgical Principles/techinques: Extent Of Surgerymentioning

confidence: 99%

International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Rhinosinusitis

Orlandi

Kingdom

Hwang

et al. 2016

Int Forum Allergy Rhinol

559

888

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Die sogenannte minimal invasive Nasennebenhöhlenchirurgie (MIST: "minimal invasive sinus technique") versteht sich als Weiterentwicklung der FESS. Befürworter der MIST halten die gezielte und hierauf beschränkte Erweiterung der Spalträume im Siebbein für ausreichend [190][191][192][193][194][195] 172,196,197]. Das Ausmaß der Operation ist allerdings variabel, die differierenden Konzepte sind nicht evidenzbasiert [196].…”

Section: Konzept Der Endoskopischen Nasennebenhöhlenchirurgieunclassified

Aktueller Stand der endonasalen Nasennebenhöhlenchirurgie

Weber

2015

Laryngo-Rhino-Otol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Endonasal endoscopic sinus surgery is the standard procedure for surgery of most paranasal sinus diseases.Appropriate frame conditions provided, the respective procedures are safe and successful.These prerequisites encompass appropriate technical equipment, anatomical oriented surgical technique, proper patient selection, and individually adapted extent of surgery.The range of endonasal sinus operations has dramatically increased during the last 20 years and reaches from partial uncinectomy to pansinusoperation with extended surgery of the frontal (Draf type III), maxillary (grade 3-4, medial maxillectomy, prelacrimal approach) and sphenoid sinus.In addition there are operations outside and beyond the paranasal sinuses. The development of surgical technique is still constantly evolving.This article gives a comprehensive review on the most recent state of the art in endoscopic sinus surgery according to the literature with the following aspects: principles and fundamentals, surgical techniques, indications, outcome, postoperative care, nasal packing and stents, technical equipment.

show abstract

“…They found identical outcomes in terms of symptoms and saccharin transit times in both groups, suggesting that more conservative surgical treatment can produce adequate results. More recently, 143 patients undergoing MIST procedures were surveyed using the Glasgow benefit inventory by Salama and coworkers 92. In their series, patients were assessed at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 1 year, and 3 years postoperatively, and significant reductions in nasal symptom scores and increases in total quality‐of‐life scores were demonstrated.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A contemporary review of endoscopic sinus surgery: Techniques, tools, and outcomes

Welch

Stankiewicz

2009

The Laryngoscope

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Chronic rhinosinusitis is estimated to nearly 25 million people annually in the United States alone. The medical management of these patients is often successful; however, when medical management fails, surgery may be indicated to bring relief. Unfortunately, surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis is not standardized and we remain without a consensus on both the extent of surgery required and the manner in which it is performed. In the past 25 years, three philosophies or schools of thought have arisen to help guide the surgical treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis. Functional endoscopic sinus surgery aims to surgically treat problem areas by ventilating the sinuses through the natural ostia and addressing all diseased sinuses when necessary. This procedure is not standardized and is patient and surgeon dependent. The minimally invasive sinus technique has been proposed as a method whereby each surgical procedure is standardized regardless of disease severity. Lastly, balloon catheter dilatation of the sinus ostia, which by itself is not truly a procedure, is also discussed as a separate philosophy since these specific tools used during endoscopic sinus surgery have quickly energized the sinus community. All three schools of thought possess benefits and drawbacks, even when used appropriately. The concepts, tools, and technologies will be reviewed here as well as outcomes in the hopes that this article will provide an understanding of the surgical options to successfully treat chronic rhinosinusitis.

show abstract

Benefit from the minimally invasive sinus technique

Abstract: The patient benefits of treatment with the minimally invasive sinus technique compare with the published patient benefits for functional endoscopic sinus surgery.

Cited by 21 publications

References 12 publications

International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Rhinosinusitis

International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Rhinosinusitis

Aktueller Stand der endonasalen Nasennebenhöhlenchirurgie

A contemporary review of endoscopic sinus surgery: Techniques, tools, and outcomes

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About