2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10490-011-9275-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benevolent leadership and follower performance: The mediating role of leader–member exchange (LMX)

Abstract: This study examines leader-member exchange (LMX) as a mediator of the relationship between benevolent leadership and follower task performance and extra-role performance. Using a sample of 223 leader-member dyads in a nonprofit organization in the People's Republic of China, results indicate that benevolent leadership and LMX are positively related to follower task performance and organizational citizenship behavior towards the organization (OCBO). Findings also support that LMX partially mediates the relation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
132
0
7

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(148 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
9
132
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Benevolence therefore literally means “goodwill,” and we believe that a leader's benevolence can certainly be good for teams. Without some degree of care and concern toward followers, leaders will not have engendered any sort of positive social exchange relationship, and subsequently, followers will have little incentive to trust a leader, to feel gratitude toward him or her and seek to reciprocate to the relationship, and will be less willing to follow the leader's guidance when he or she attempts to coordinate team task activities (Chan & Mak, ; Chen et al., ; Farh & Cheng, ; Martinez, ).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Benevolence therefore literally means “goodwill,” and we believe that a leader's benevolence can certainly be good for teams. Without some degree of care and concern toward followers, leaders will not have engendered any sort of positive social exchange relationship, and subsequently, followers will have little incentive to trust a leader, to feel gratitude toward him or her and seek to reciprocate to the relationship, and will be less willing to follow the leader's guidance when he or she attempts to coordinate team task activities (Chan & Mak, ; Chen et al., ; Farh & Cheng, ; Martinez, ).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, we expect that benevolent leader behaviors will be beneficial for team performance as benevolence increases from a low to an optimal intermediate level. As initially discussed, studies have positioned benevolence as a salutary leader exchange behavior, one that stimulates followers to hold positive reciprocal attitudes and feel obligations to the leader, such as admiration and obedience (Chan & Mak, ; Chen et al., ). For teams, we propose that benevolence will motivate team members to comply with leader task instructions by being dedicated and effortful in their work, and to contribute to those task activities that help reach team goals (Farh & Cheng, ; Wang et al., ).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ishikawa then empirically demonstrated that gatekeeping leadership, a leadership style that encourages information sharing, is conductive to shared leadership in R&D teams, which results in high team performance. Likewise, Chan and Mak (2012) examined the effect and the influencing mechanism of benevolent leadership, an indigenous Chinese leadership style. The results of Chan and Mak's (2012) study support the critical role of benevolent leadership behavior in shaping leader-member exchange qualities and employees' work performance using the sample of a Hong Kong volunteer organization.…”
Section: New Constructs Can Be Established By Studying Leaders In Asiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantages gained include the increase of communication, levels of emotional support, and wider access (Dienesch & Liden, 1986;Graen & Scandura, 1987). The LMX affects the followers' task performance (Chan & Mak's, 2012), improves job performance, lowers turnover intention (Bauer et al, 2006), and improves job satisfaction, and organizational commitment (Lee, Teng, & Chen, 2015). The research by Hassan, et al (2013) examines that the LMX positively influences the subordinates' perception of leader effectiveness.…”
Section: Lmxmentioning
confidence: 99%