BER performance of RAKE receivers with synchronisation in realistic mobile radio environments

Erben, H.; Zeisberg, S.; Nuszkowski, H.; Finger, Adolf

doi:10.1109/isssta.1994.379543

Cited by 7 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The formal structure previously developed can also be extended, by redefining the low-pass impulse response of the tapped delay line, to the characterization of a more efficient scheme of Rake receiver with adaptive branch delay time [5]. This receiver combines only the A contribution among those available which have the maximum power whatever their delay.…”

Section: Evaluation Methodologymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Effects of spreading code on the performance of CDMA picocellular systems with RAKE receivers

Mazzini

Tralli

Proceedings of ICUPC '95 - 4th IEEE International Conference on Universal Personal Communications

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

By exploiting analytical and semianalytical methodologies, performance of DS-CDMA system for picocellular applications, including multipath propagation channels and Rake receiver, is evaluated.System performance is defined in terms of both mean bit error probability and outage probability, taking the exact evaluation of spreading codes correlation into account. The spreading sequences investigated include some well known two-level sequences and the recently investigated multilevel sequences with complex mapping. By varying spreading codes and propagation channel conditions, the following aspects have been considered in the numerical results: comparison of Rake receivers and simple correlator receiver, tradeoff between receiving taps number and performance, degradation effects due to not ideal spreading code correlation, comparison between binary and multilevel sequences.

show abstract

Section: Evaluation Methodologymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Both the classical Rake [3] [4] and the adaptive Rake receiver which combines the strongest propagation paths [5] are investigated through the standard Gaussian assumption for multiple access interference.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%