2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbi.2020.09.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Best practice recommendations for the measurement and interpretation of salivary proinflammatory cytokines in biobehavioral research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Minimum detection limits for IL-6 were 0.07 pg/mL. IL-6 values in the sample ranged from 0.07 to 92 pg/mL, mean (SD) = 5.79 (11.52) pg/mL, which is comparable to other, larger samples ( 36 , 42 , 52 ). Minimum detection limits for TNF-α were 0.04 pg/mL.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 47%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Minimum detection limits for IL-6 were 0.07 pg/mL. IL-6 values in the sample ranged from 0.07 to 92 pg/mL, mean (SD) = 5.79 (11.52) pg/mL, which is comparable to other, larger samples ( 36 , 42 , 52 ). Minimum detection limits for TNF-α were 0.04 pg/mL.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 47%
“…Minimum detection limits for TNF-α were 0.04 pg/mL. TNF-α values in the sample ranged from 0.22 to 336.98 pg/mL, mean (SD) = 10.42 (43.53) pg/mL, which is comparable to other, larger samples ( 52 , 53 ). ELISA procedures performed by Salimetrics were reported to be reliable via several parameters including linearity, spike and recovery testing, intra- and inter- assay precision, and freeze/thaw stability ( 54 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 47%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These findings agree with the previous finding on higher CRP estimates collected from the passive drool method than the swab‐based method (Topkas et al, 2012). Organic or synthetic swabs may cause false‐negative results through retention and incomplete analyte release and are not recommended for salivary CRP measurements (Riis et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, different responses to exercise for IL-6 were reported for serum and salivary IL-6, which could indicate different origins of salivary and systemic IL-6 [ 40 ]. In the analysis of salivary cytokines, it can be challenging to achieve proper sampling and detection [ 63 ]. Other potential confounders, such as sample collection technique, cold chain management, diurnal variation, and oral health might also play a role [ 63 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%