Google Earth and Virtual Visualizations in Geoscience Education and Research 2012
DOI: 10.1130/2012.2492(28)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Best practices on how to design Google Earth tours for education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, 360 • images or 360 • videos may be assembled in an application that does not illustrate a single model but represents a journey between different locations [24]. 3D models generated by scanners [24] or photogrammetry [25], for example, in addition to straight 3D modeling, and aerial photography are also suitable for complementing a 360 • -based application [26].…”
Section: Technical Variantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, 360 • images or 360 • videos may be assembled in an application that does not illustrate a single model but represents a journey between different locations [24]. 3D models generated by scanners [24] or photogrammetry [25], for example, in addition to straight 3D modeling, and aerial photography are also suitable for complementing a 360 • -based application [26].…”
Section: Technical Variantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, it was thought that the realistic imagery would be more cognitively demanding for the subjects, which would increase the likelihood of the experiment producing significant results. The bias towards testing vertical camera views rather than the oblique ones follows the suggestion by Treves and Bailey (2012) that the virtual camera in map tours should not use an oblique angle unless there is a compelling reason to do so.…”
Section: Conceptual Framework and Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 98%