Better Measurement for Performance Improvement in Low‐ and Middle‐Income Countries: The Primary Health Care Performance Initiative (PHCPI) Experience of Conceptual Framework Development and Indicator Selection

Abstract

Policy Points: Strengthening accountability through better measurement and reporting is vital to ensure progress in improving quality primary health care (PHC) systems and achieving universal health coverage (UHC).The Primary Health Care Performance Initiative (PHCPI) provides national decision makers and global stakeholders with opportunities to benchmark and accelerate performance improvement through better performance measurement.Results from the initial PHC performance assessments in low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMICs) are helping guide PHC reforms and investments and improve the PHCPI's instruments and indicators. Findings from future assessment activities will further amplify cross‐country comparisons and peer learning to improve PHC.New indicators and sources of data are needed to better understand PHC system performance in LMICs. ContextThe Primary Health Care Performance Initiative (PHCPI), a collaboration between the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, The World Bank, and the World Health Organization, in partnership with Ariadne Labs and Results for Development, was launched in 2015 with the aim of catalyzing improvements in primary health care (PHC) systems in 135 low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMICs), in order to accelerate progress toward universal health coverage. Through more comprehensive and actionable measurement of quality PHC, the PHCPI stimulates peer learning among LMICs and informs decision makers to guide PHC investments and reforms. Instruments for performance assessment and improvement are in development; to date, a conceptual framework and 2 sets of performance indicators have been released.MethodsThe PHCPI team developed the conceptual framework through literature reviews and consultations with an advisory committee of international experts. We generated 2 sets of performance indicators selected from a literature review of relevant indicators, cross‐referenced against indicators available from international sources, and evaluated through 2 separate modified Delphi processes, consisting of online surveys and in‐person facilitated discussions with experts.FindingsThe PHCPI conceptual framework builds on the current understanding of PHC system performance through an expanded emphasis on the role of service delivery. The first set of performance indicators, 36 Vital Signs, facilitates comparisons across countries and over time. The second set, 56 Diagnostic Indicators, elucidates underlying drivers of performance. Key challenges include a lack of available data for several indicators and a lack of validated indicators for important dimensions of quality PHC.ConclusionsThe availability of data is critical to assessing PHC performance, particularly patient experience and quality of care. The PHCPI will continue to develop and test additional performance assessment instruments, including composite indices and national performance dashboards. Through country engagement, the PHCPI will further refine its instruments and engage with governments to better design and finance primary heal...

National Response to COVID-19 in the Republic of Korea and Lessons Learned for Other Countries

“…Many of these responses reflect important activities that included but went far beyond changes to care delivery, such as governance, surveillance, community engagement, supply chain management, and rapid use of data for developing and adapting strategies. 18 Our hope is that by explicating the strategies to prevent, detect, and respond from South Korea, transferable and applicable knowledge can be adopted by other countries and the global community facing the COVID-19 challenge.…”

Evaluating the performance of South African primary care: a cross-sectional descriptive survey

“…A conceptual framework produced by the Primary Health Care Performance Initiative (PHCPI) attempts to define the key components of effective PHC and allocates items to the following categories in a logic model: system, inputs, service delivery, outputs and outcomes. 11,12 Service delivery has five key sub-categories: population health management, facility and organisational management, access, availability of effective services and high-quality PHC. In the absence of electronic health records and routinely collected data in the African context the Primary Care Assessment Tool (PCAT) is one of the few tools available to measure primary care.…”

Community-Based Health Planning and Services Plus programme in Ghana: A qualitative study with stakeholders in two Systems Learning Districts on improving the implementation of primary health care

“…and outcomes (Does the PHC system efficiently deliver better outcomes and greater equity?) [22,23]. From Fig 1, the framework flows from left to right, which is synonymous to other input-process-outputoutcome logic models.…”