2020
DOI: 10.1017/cnj.2020.14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Between demonstrative and definite: A grammar competition model of the evolution of French l-determiners

Abstract: This article investigates the spread of the le/la/les-forms in the diachrony of French on the basis of large-scale corpora. It focuses on the issue of their “mixed” distribution viz. the observation that during a long period of time the le/la/les-forms in French do not pattern as either (anaphoric) demonstratives from which they originate (Late Latin ille), nor as (uniqueness-based) definites, which they end up becoming in Modern French. We model the phenomenon as a competition between two grammars which ascri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our morpho-syntactic analysis of D EXPL contrasts with that of Simonenko & Carlier (2016), who develop a semantic treatment that treats all exponents of l - as semantically weak Ds. Moreover, they assume that n NON-CT does not occur with D in OF; for the two OF texts that we study, though D-drop is more frequent with n NON-CT , it is not obligatory.…”
Section: Tracking the Trajectory Of φ-Featuresmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Our morpho-syntactic analysis of D EXPL contrasts with that of Simonenko & Carlier (2016), who develop a semantic treatment that treats all exponents of l - as semantically weak Ds. Moreover, they assume that n NON-CT does not occur with D in OF; for the two OF texts that we study, though D-drop is more frequent with n NON-CT , it is not obligatory.…”
Section: Tracking the Trajectory Of φ-Featuresmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…While we cannot claim that the use of the definite article with anaphoric referents predates its use with unique referents, the differences in frequencies are quite striking. These differences may be due to the fact that the anaphoric context, while based on familiarity, may also satisfy uniqueness conditions, and would thus be more likely to appear as definite at the time of language change (see also Simonenko & Carlier 2020). This assumption is further explored in 5.3 and we will return to it in the concluding section.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While Classical Latin did not have a consistent marking of (in)definiteness, from Late Latin onwards, definiteness marking at the noun phrase level increases (Carlier & De Mulder 2010). This increase continues in Old French, in the form of the definite determiner derived from Late Latin demonstrative ille (Simonenko & Carlier 2020a). It is therefore highly plausible that, in comparison with the Classical and even Late Latin baseline, the stage of the determiner loss in noun phrases with short possessives that we clearly observe in Old French after 1000 has been preceded by their rise in this context before 1000.…”
Section: A Failed Changementioning
confidence: 94%
“…The rise-and-fall evolution hypothesis is all the more plausible in view of the fact that the possessive only rarely co-occurs with a (demonstrative) determiner in Latin (including in Late Latin). In general, the rate of bare nouns in Classical Latin has been estimated to be 77% (Carlier & Lamiroy 2018), while at the beginning of the Old French period it is down to approximately 40% (Simonenko & Carlier 2020a). The empirical question at stake here is whether the rise-and-fall pattern can be detected in the observable time period, that is, after 800, or whether the rise of determiners with short possessives precedes the earliest preserved records in the vernacular.…”
Section: A Failed Changementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation