Between-row mowing + in-row band-applied herbicide for weed control in<i>Glycine max</i>

Donald, William W.

doi:10.1614/0043-1745(2000)048[0487:brmirb]2.0.co;2

Cited by 15 publications

(26 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In earlier research (Donald 2000a(Donald , 2000b(Donald , 2005Donald et al 2001) and in these experiments (Figures 3 to 5), most summer annual total weed cover escaping between-row mowing treatments was giant foxtail. Mowing controlled annual broadleaf and grass weeds differently.…”

Section: Total Weed Cover and Maximum Weed Canopy Heightmentioning

confidence: 52%

“…Giant foxtail cover became greater, faster, when corn shading was reduced by decreased or delayed crop canopy closure due to reduced stands. In previous research in reduced-and no-till (Donald 2000a(Donald , 2000bDonald et al 2001), a second between-row mowing killed the growth of giant foxtail surviving the first mowing. Corn shading likely limited subsequent giant foxtail germination, emergence, and recovery from mowing (Santelmann et al 1963).…”

Section: Total Weed Cover and Maximum Weed Canopy Heightmentioning

confidence: 86%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Control of Both Winter Annual and Summer Annual Weeds in No-till Corn with Between-row Mowing Systems

Donald¹

2007

Weed Technology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In previous research, summer annual weeds were successfully controlled in no-till corn with between-row mowing systems that consisted of soil-residual preemergence herbicides banded over corn rows followed by mowing weeds close to the soil surface one or two times later during the growing season. The objective of this research was to determine whether between-row mowing systems could successfully control both winter annual and summer annual weeds as well as broadcast herbicides perform in no-till corn. In two of three years in Missouri, between-row mowing systems controlled and reduced both winter annual and summer annual weed cover and prevented weeds from reducing corn yields. Corn yields for the following no-till weed management systems equaled the weed-free check: winter annual weed control with between-row mowing plus preplant, banded, postemergence-applied glyphosate at 1.1 kg ae/ha and later summer annual weed control with postplant, banded, preemergence-applied atrazine plus S-metolachlor at 2.2 plus 1.8 kg ai/ha followed by between-row mowing. Winter annual weeds growing between rows were controlled with one mowing, and later summer annual weeds were controlled with either one late or “middle” mowing or two mowings (i.e., early and late). Total herbicide use was reduced 50% (i.e., 25 and 25%, respectively) in no-till corn. Commercially acceptable corn stands were needed for between-row mowing systems to adequately control weeds. In one of three years when corn stands were half of those of the other two years, broadcast herbicides performed better than between-row mowing systems in no-till corn.

show abstract

Section: Total Weed Cover and Maximum Weed Canopy Heightmentioning

confidence: 52%

Section: Total Weed Cover and Maximum Weed Canopy Heightmentioning

confidence: 86%

Control of Both Winter Annual and Summer Annual Weeds in No-till Corn with Between-row Mowing Systems

Donald¹

2007

Weed Technology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Integration of interrow cultivation with banding of herbicide full rate over the crop rows did not ensure weed control and did not provide satisfactory bean yield in both years, as expected, although Buhler et al (1992) and Donald (2000) demonstrated satisfactory weed control by band herbicide application over soybean rows combined with mechanical interrow cultivation. …”

Section: Weed Managementmentioning

confidence: 67%

Economic analysis of integrated weed management in field bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

Štefanić¹,

Štefanić²,

Murdoch³

2003

PLANT SOIL ENVIRON

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Field experiments were conducted in field bean in the north-eastern part of the Republic of Croatia to compare weed control and crop response under different management practices within the critical period of field bean production. The practices consisted in broadcast application of labelled rate of preemergence herbicide (PRE) and postemergence herbicide application: (POST) broadcast, band application over the rows, and band application combined with mechanical cultivation using of different herbicide doses recommended by the manufacturer (2×, 1×, 1/2×, 1/4×, 1/8×). In 1999, weed control with PRE application of pendimethalin was superior to POST bentazone application due to late emergence of weeds and lack of residual herbicide control. In 2000 bentazone combined with cycloxydim controlled weeds in field bean better than PRE herbicide application. Based on the results of this research, single PRE or POST application of herbicide did not control a broad spectrum of weeds and did not provide the commercially acceptable full season control. Reduced rates of herbicide are not advisable under high weed pressure.

show abstract

“…When mowed close to the soil surface two or more times, populations of S. faberi were eliminated or suppressed in Missouri soybean and corn fields (Donald 2000a(Donald , b, 2006Donald et al 2001). Shading by the crop canopy also reduced weed growth in these studies.…”

Section: Response To Other Human Manipulationsmentioning

confidence: 79%

The Biology of Canadian Weeds. 141. Setaria faberi Herrm.

Nurse¹,

Darbyshire²,

Bertin³

et al. 2009

Can. J. Plant Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

known as giant foxtail, is an annual graminaceous weed that is native to eastern China, has colonized eastern North America and is expanding its range westward. This species is primarily self-pollinated and the only mechanism of reproduction is by seed. Adult plants may reach 2 m in height and produce over 2000 seeds per panicle. Seeds may possess non-deep physiological dormancy when freshly produced, and can form small persistent seed banks. If not controlled, S. faberi populations can cause severe yield reductions in corn and soybean crops. Several herbicides are available to provide chemical control; however, resistance to some modes of action, (ALS, ACCase, and Photosystem II) have been identified in Canada and the United States. Leaves and seeds of this species provide a food source to several species of mammals, birds, and insects.

show abstract

Between-row mowing + in-row band-applied herbicide for weed control inGlycine max

Cited by 15 publications

References 26 publications

Control of Both Winter Annual and Summer Annual Weeds in No-till Corn with Between-row Mowing Systems

Control of Both Winter Annual and Summer Annual Weeds in No-till Corn with Between-row Mowing Systems

Economic analysis of integrated weed management in field bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

The Biology of Canadian Weeds. 141. Setaria faberi Herrm.

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About