1997
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-59229-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bewerten technischer Systeme

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“… Acoustics,  System Safety and Integration, and  Structure and Material have been introduced to not falsify the assessment results by subject-specific exclusion criteria. The ranked space method according to Breiing and Knosala [24] has been selected for weighting the evaluation criteria to ensure an objective and knowledge-based rating. The rating has been carried out by a weighted point rating, which has been conducted by the project partners with different fields of expertise.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“… Acoustics,  System Safety and Integration, and  Structure and Material have been introduced to not falsify the assessment results by subject-specific exclusion criteria. The ranked space method according to Breiing and Knosala [24] has been selected for weighting the evaluation criteria to ensure an objective and knowledge-based rating. The rating has been carried out by a weighted point rating, which has been conducted by the project partners with different fields of expertise.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different weighting methods such as  the hierarchical weighting [06],  weighting by target preference matrix [07], [09],  the weighting by means of influence matrix [09] and  the weighting by ranked space method [24] can be used.…”
Section: Weighting Of Evaluation Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to Graeßler et al (2020) and Dermeval et al (2016), ontology-based approaches are a promising way to support the identification of interactions, as presented exemplary by Soomro et al (2014). However, dependencies and interactions do not only occur in the area of requirements management, but also in the area of decision making, although in multi-criteria evaluation a condition is that criteria are independent of each other (Breiing and Knosala, 1997). Regarding this restriction, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) was developed, which was then extended to the Analytic Network Process (ANP), which consider the interactions occurring in practice (Saaty, 2004;Sipahi and Timor, 2010).…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They describe the activities of discovery, management, and disposition of critical relationships (Robinson et al, 2003). Breiing and Knosala (1997) present a very generic model from the research field of decision making, which contains only the most important relations necessary for multi-criteria evaluation. A summary of the analysis is shown in Table 1.…”
Section: Requirement and Criteria Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%