Beyond Institutional Collective Action: Why and When Do Metropolitan Governments Collaborate?

Salas, Manlio Felipe Castillo

doi:10.1177/0160323x19884618

Cited by 6 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The regional nature of urban systems throughout the U.S. means that self-organized collaboration between fragmented local governments is a necessary but delicate approach to solving regional sustainability problems (Carr, Hawkins and Westberg 2017). In this context, interlocal collaboration refers to the development of coordinated efforts by independent general-purpose jurisdictions to achieve a common goal (Costillo 2019; Youm and Feiock 2019; Chen and Thurmaier 2009; ICMA 2015). Because regional urban systems are geographically connected, there are transboundary flows through networks of people and trade (Ramaswami et al 2018).…”

Section: Explanation Of Interlocal Collaboration For Sustainabilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A significant section of the literature that examines interlocal collaboration used the institutional collective action (ICA) framework to assess the nature and mechanisms of these agreements (Feiock 2009; 2013; Andrew 2009; Hawkins 2010; Terman, Feiock and Youm 2020; Carr and Hawkins 2013). This framework was developed to explain how interlocal collaboration agreements are reached and why actors choose certain collaboration mechanisms to address collective action dilemmas (Costillo 2019; Feiock 2013). The ICA framework assumes that the nature of the collective action issue, the affected actors, and the institutions in place will dictate the choices of actors involved and the mechanism used for collaboration.…”

Section: Explanation Of Interlocal Collaboration For Sustainabilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

State Interventions and Interlocal Collaborations Across the Three Pillars of Sustainability

Farmer

2022

State and Local Government Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The literature on interlocal sustainability has acknowledged that the resources and authority of state governments influence the collaborative sustainability policy actions of local governments. However, there is an absence of empirical evidence that shows how this influence varies across the environmental protection, economic development, and social equity pillars of sustainability. This study uses data from a 2015 national survey of U.S. cities to shed light on the connection between state-level interventions and regional partnerships across the three primary sustainability policy dimensions. With an understanding gleaned from the concept of contested federalism, this analysis employed Bayesian techniques to examine how state fiscal support for sustainability, along with fiscal and functional decentralization in state systems, affect municipal collaborative policy efforts. The findings suggest a positive link between supportive state-level endeavors and local-level collaborations. However, state influences can have different implications across the three pillars of sustainability.

show abstract

Section: Explanation Of Interlocal Collaboration For Sustainabilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Explanation Of Interlocal Collaboration For Sustainabilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

State Interventions and Interlocal Collaborations Across the Three Pillars of Sustainability

Farmer

2022

State and Local Government Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…As Provan & Kenis ( 2008 ) argue, there are different forms of network management (by shared governance, lead organization, or network administrative organization). Although networks governed by central organizations predominate in Mexico, there are also successful cases of horizontal and less concentrated networks, for example, to provide or regulate local public services (Castillo, 2019 , 2022 ; Ramírez, 2012 ; Ramírez & Castillo, 2017 ).…”

Section: Analytical Framework: Managing Emergencies In Mexican Federa...mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Conflicts for the COVID-19 Pandemic Management in Mexico: An Analysis of Intergovernmental Relations

Ramírez

Salas

2022

Public Organiz Rev

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The paper presents an exploratory case study on the operation of intergovernmental relations (IGR) in Mexico during the management of the COVID-19 pandemic to identify and explain the main conflicts faced in the management of the emergency. The main findings are: Mexico is undergoing an aggressive re-centralization process encouraged by inequalities among states and their lack of professional public administrative systems; 2) formal rules for balancing IGR lose value versus informal rules based on transitory political-partisan agreements; 3) the weakness of the rule of law, power imbalances, lack of clear rules, and communication problems difficult intergovernmental collaboration in emergencies management.

show abstract

“…State government transportation policy can shape and constrain collaborative behaviors [3,30,45,46]. Additionally, state associations of MPOs might facilitate collaborations [6,47,48]. "Regional models of cooperation," as the U.S. Department of Transportation addresses it, allows an MPO to develop multi-jurisdictional transportation plans and agreements to improve regional transportation and air pollution beyond the agency boundaries, reducing interruptions to essential coordination of solutions [33].…”

Section: Existing Institutionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

An Item Response Theory Model of Inter-Regional Collaboration for Transportation Planning in the United States

Kim

Feiock³

2021

Land

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Regional governments and regional intergovernmental organizations play an increasingly important role in land use and transportation planning in many countries. In the U.S., regional organizations such as metropolitan planning organizations provide regional forums and institutions to coordinate actions of local government necessary to overcome collective action problems that result from the fragmentation of local authority. Their regional scope allows them to directly address collaboration problems or broker collaborative arrangements among local governments within their boundaries. Nevertheless, the scale of regional problems often extends beyond the boundaries of these regional entities. Thus, collaboration across regional governance organizations is necessary to address problems that have multi-regional impacts, such as large transportation projects. Extant research generally measures regional collaboration based on counts of collaboration actions undertaken, but this does not account for the fact that some are symbolic, while others require resources and commitment. Drawing insights from the institutional collective action framework, we advance an explanation for how regional organizations overcome collaboration risks to participate in collaborative solutions to regional and multi-regional problems. The analysis employs a unique national survey of metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs) and adds a novel application of item response theory (IRT) to capture differences in risk or difficulty among collaborative actions. The IRT results offer support for our ICA-based explanation of collaboration commitments. The implications of the findings for theory development and empirical study of RIGOs are discussed in conclusion.

show abstract

Beyond Institutional Collective Action: Why and When Do Metropolitan Governments Collaborate?

Cited by 6 publications

References 25 publications

State Interventions and Interlocal Collaborations Across the Three Pillars of Sustainability

State Interventions and Interlocal Collaborations Across the Three Pillars of Sustainability

The Conflicts for the COVID-19 Pandemic Management in Mexico: An Analysis of Intergovernmental Relations

An Item Response Theory Model of Inter-Regional Collaboration for Transportation Planning in the United States

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About