2000
DOI: 10.1037/1082-989x.5.2.214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beyond the Spearman–Brown: A structural approach to maximal reliability.

Abstract: The requirement of parallel parts has long been the cornerstone of classic reliability theory. By recasting reliability in a structural equation framework, items, raters, or judges no longer need to be treated as equivalent entities. Instead, unique reliability estimates can be determined for each and collectively used to assess the maximal reliability of a weighted composite, with the composite reliability submitted to inferential test. Procedures are shown to generalize from single to multifactor application… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The faceted design-four raters crossed by three tasks-makes traditional reliability statistics (e.g., Cronbach's alpha) inappropriate (Drewes, 2000). Moreover, there is controversy over whether divergent thinking tasks are interchangeable-they seem to represent fixed rather than random effects (Almeida, Prieto, Ferrando, Oliveira, & Ferrándiz, 2008;Silvia et al, 2008, Study 1).…”
Section: Divergent Thinkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The faceted design-four raters crossed by three tasks-makes traditional reliability statistics (e.g., Cronbach's alpha) inappropriate (Drewes, 2000). Moreover, there is controversy over whether divergent thinking tasks are interchangeable-they seem to represent fixed rather than random effects (Almeida, Prieto, Ferrando, Oliveira, & Ferrándiz, 2008;Silvia et al, 2008, Study 1).…”
Section: Divergent Thinkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, there is controversy over whether divergent thinking tasks are interchangeable-they seem to represent fixed rather than random effects (Almeida, Prieto, Ferrando, Oliveira, & Ferrándiz, 2008;Silvia et al, 2008, Study 1). For the present design, an analogous and appropriate reliability statistic is maximal reliability (Drewes, 2000), known as H, which represents -the degree to which the indicators can capture information about the underlying factor‖ (Gagné & Hancock, 2006, p. 68). Like Cronbach's alpha, H expresses reliability in a 0 to 1 range, with higher values indicating higher reliability.…”
Section: Divergent Thinkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Discard non-traditional items with low loadings. Estimate reliabilities of the retained non-traditional items by squaring their loadings on the latent factor (Drewes, 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, this method appears promising. First, the factor structure of the snapshot scores showed good construct reliability (Drewes, 2000)-all of the H values were over .80, so good score reliability was achieved with only three raters and two tasks. Second, good evidence for concurrent validity was found.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, an analogous statistic for latent variable models is maximal reliability (Drewes, 2000), which represents "the degree to which the indicators can capture information about the underlying factor" (Gagné & Hancock, 2006, p. 68). The higher order creativity variable (H = .83) and the lower order brick (H = .84) and knife (H = .88) variables displayed good reliability.…”
Section: Model Specification and Analytic Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%