2020
DOI: 10.1080/02185377.2020.1837193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beyond the status quo and revisionism: an analysis of the role of China and the approaches of China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) to the global order

Abstract: What are the roles China plays and what approaches does China take to the global order? This paper goes beyond the singular and static view on the roles of states as either status quo or revisionist and introduces more subtle roles of states with multiapproaches of Status Quo, Parallel Supplement, Nested Enhancement, Regime Shifting, Competitive Regime Creation and Ideological Confrontation. After coding 1889 events from the 'Belt and Road Portal' and then taking eight most frequent case clusters of the BRI as… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fourth, any framework that generates 128 analytically distinct types of revisionist behavior is unlikely to prove useful as a guide for empirical research. There will almost certainly end up being too many empty boxes, and the categories that do contain cases will have too few features in common to provide grounds for meaningful comparisons (see also Liu, 2021). Despite Natalizia and Termine's (2021: 89) effort to justify the juxtaposition of the PRC against early 20th-century Japan, for instance, these two cases end up resting in broadly the same area of their matrix, thereby blunting the contrast between them.…”
Section: Revisiting the Natalizia–termine Analytical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fourth, any framework that generates 128 analytically distinct types of revisionist behavior is unlikely to prove useful as a guide for empirical research. There will almost certainly end up being too many empty boxes, and the categories that do contain cases will have too few features in common to provide grounds for meaningful comparisons (see also Liu, 2021). Despite Natalizia and Termine's (2021: 89) effort to justify the juxtaposition of the PRC against early 20th-century Japan, for instance, these two cases end up resting in broadly the same area of their matrix, thereby blunting the contrast between them.…”
Section: Revisiting the Natalizia–termine Analytical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liu [ 48 ] discusses the China’s BRI projects have strengthened its regional cooperation across the world, and China has become an economic powerhouse through good governance and the implementation of infrastructure works. Today, the BRI initiatives perform like international governance and regional engagement.…”
Section: Discussion and Results Of Bri In Ethiopiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The countries, such as Malaysia, are currently demanding to control the SQ nature with respect to their nuclear arsenals. Liu (2021) examined the revisionism and SQ approaches over the projects established to control and prevent the drugs. Although improvements or changes can always be made and cannot be restrained at some stages, the SQ nature should be tested due to discrimination and causing impacts on the FDPS.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%