2008
DOI: 10.1641/b580208
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beyond Urban Legends: An Emerging Framework of Urban Ecology, as Illustrated by the Baltimore Ecosystem Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
211
0
7

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 306 publications
(220 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
211
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…However, given the limitation of two study sites from a single metropolitan area, our results only represent an initial step toward understanding the ecology of raccoons in the urban matrix. Recent research on commensal bird species demonstrated they actually exhibited highly variable spatial distributions across the Baltimore metropolitan area, despite their close association with urban areas and a perception of a ubiquitous distribution across the landscape (Pickett et al 2008). Clearly, additional research on raccoons and other urbanassociated species is needed on a larger scale and in a variety of urban systems given the limitations of our study and the complexities of urban landscapes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…However, given the limitation of two study sites from a single metropolitan area, our results only represent an initial step toward understanding the ecology of raccoons in the urban matrix. Recent research on commensal bird species demonstrated they actually exhibited highly variable spatial distributions across the Baltimore metropolitan area, despite their close association with urban areas and a perception of a ubiquitous distribution across the landscape (Pickett et al 2008). Clearly, additional research on raccoons and other urbanassociated species is needed on a larger scale and in a variety of urban systems given the limitations of our study and the complexities of urban landscapes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…However, there is a lack of theory that links the scale of the city (resilience in cities), to the scale of ''systems of cities'' (resilience of cities). More explicitly, we lack theory to analyze the panarchies of urban networks, i.e., the dynamic interlinkages between social and technical networks that sustain energy, matter, and information, and how these dynamic networks influence ecological networks and the capacity to generate local-to-regional ecosystem services (but see Alberti and Marzluff 2004;Pickett et al 2008). For instance, how do technical networks shape urban land-use patterns and influence urban ecosystems?…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A presumption in this article is that such services are inextricably linked to ecological processes and the focus lies on such ''ecosystem services,'' i.e., the benefits urban inhabitants and cities derive from ecosystem processes including, e.g., improved water and air quality, storm protection, flood mitigation, sewage treatment, micro climate regulation, and recreation and health values (Daily 1997;Bolund and Hunhammar 1999;Elmqvist et al 2008). As ecological processes are in turn modified and entangled in social, and therefore political processes (most obviously through competing landuses), the city comes into view as constituted out of political social-ecological processes (Swyngedouw 2006;Pickett et al 2008;Grimm et al 2008). Based on this, a normative strategy for urban governance would be to maintain or even enhance essential ecosystem services and to accomplish this in ways that recognize the spatial distribution of ecosystem services and their relation to social equity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That being the case, it is imperative to know why trees thrive in some communities and not in others, beyond the physical properties of the sites. Stormwater management, including reduction of impervious surfaces and protection of the Chesapeake from fertilizer runoff, will be most effective if managers understand relationships between social characteristics and vegetation cover Pickett et al 2008). Since the vast majority of land is privately owned, it is the decisions of individuals and households, which often reflect characteristics of neighborhoods, that are crucial to understand.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%