Bias of the Hubble Constant Value Caused by Errors in Galactic Distance Indicators

Abstract

The bias in the determination of the Hubble parameter and the Hubble constant in the modern Universe is discussed. It could appear due to the statistical processing of data on the redshifts of galaxies and the estimated distances based on some statistical relations with limited accuracy. This causes a number of effects leading to either underestimation or overestimation of the Hubble parameter when using any methods of statistical processing, primarily the least squares method (LSM). The value of the Hubble constant is underestimated when processing a whole sample; when the sample is constrained by distance, especially when constrained from above. Moreover, it is significantly overestimated due to the data selection. The bias significantly exceeds the values of the erro ofr the Hubble constant calculated by the LSM formulae. These effects are demonstrated both analytically and using Monte Carlo simulations, which introduce deviations in the velocities and estimated distances to the original dataset described by the Hubble law. The characteristics of the deviations are similar to real observations. Errors in the estimated distances are up to 20%. They lead to the fact that, when processing the same mock sample using LSM, it is possible to obtain an estimate of the Hubble constant from 96% of the true value when processing the entire sample to 110% when processing the subsample with distances limited from above. The impact of these effects can lead to a bias in the Hubble constant obtained from real data and an overestimation of the accuracy of determining this value. This may call into question the accuracy of determining the Hubble constant and can significantly reduce the tension between the values obtained from the observations in the early and modern Universes, which were actively discussed during the last year.

On the Evolution of the Hubble Constant with the SNe Ia Pantheon Sample and Baryon Acoustic Oscillations: A Feasibility Study for GRB-Cosmology in 2030

“…Ref. [275]. This consideration holds also for the quadruply lensed quasars which are another method to measure H 0 [276].…”

The Hubble constant tension: current status and future perspectives through new cosmological probes

“…Other suggestions in literature are given by the model-independent approaches [617][618][619][620][621][622][623][624][625][626][627][628][629][630][631][632][633][634][635], cosmography [636][637][638][639][640][641][642][643][644][645][646][647][648], cosmic triangles schemes [649], machine learning techniques [609,650], the ABC algorithm [651], the alternative resolution of Friedmann equations [652,653] and the discussion of distance measurement in cosmology [654]. Finally, it is essential to discuss also the presence of biases in the collected data samples [655][656][657][658][659][660][661] since, if this is the case, the biased variables may lead to unreliable cosmological results. A more complete descript...…”

Gravity. The generation of a Gravitational Field around a Laser Beam

“…The speed of light towards the positive z-direction equals the speed of light (the constant "c = 300.000 km/s"). But the speed of light in the x-y plane has to be exactly zero [9, 14,15]. Else the diameter of the laser beam would become larger and larger during the propagation along the positive z-direction.…”