Bibliometric analysis and visualization of Nanotechnology Research Field

Ganaie, Shabir Ahmad; Wani, Javaid Ahmad

doi:10.1080/09737766.2021.2008780

Cited by 7 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 51 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The highlights of a few prominent ones are “healthcare service quality” (SQ) (Valencia-Arias et al , 2018), SQ of “travel agencies” (Chen et al , 2016), genesis of SQ research (Pereira et al , 2013) and “perceived quality of internet services” (Duque Oliva et al , 2006). Similarly, the literature survey highlights such works in various domains like “economics” (Sharif and Mahmood, 2004), “E-Marketing” (He, 2012) “medical science” (Ullah et al , 2008), agriculture (Majid, 2000), “carbapenem resistance” (Sweileh et al , 2016), “carbon market research” (Du et al , 2015), “organic chemistry” (Kumari, 2009; Kumari, 2006), “alternative energy research” (Mao et al , 2015), “medicinal chemistry” (Rivera et al , 2010; Soboleva and Evdokimenkova, 2018), “analytical chemistry” (Arkhipov and Berezkin, 2002), “nanotechnology” (Ganaie and Wani, 2021), the “fuzzy sets theory field” (Cobo et al , 2011), “fluorochemistry” (Bouznik and Zibareva, 2015), “surfactant chemistry” (Bailon-Moreno et al , 2005) and “catalysis” (Zibareva and Parmon, 2013; Zibareva et al , 2014).…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mapping research output on library and information science research domain in South Africa: a bibliometric visualisation

Wani

Ganaie²,

Rehman³

2022

IDD

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose The purpose of this study is to examine the research output on “library and information science” (LIS) research domain in South Africa. It also highlights the top LIS research organisations, authors, journals, collaboration types and commonly used keywords. This research will aid in the identification of emerging concepts, trends and advances in this subject. Design/methodology/approach The Web of Science (WoS), an indexing and abstracting database, served as a tool for bibliographical data. By applying advanced search features, the authors curated data from 1989 to 2021 through the WoS subject category WC = (Information Science & Library Science), limiting the scope to the region, CU = (South Africa), which resulted in 1,034 articles. Moreover, the research focuses on science mapping using the R package for reliable analysis. Findings The findings reveal that the publications have considerably grown over time, indicating significant attention among researchers in LIS. The findings indicate the critical operator’s performance, existing thematic choices and subsequent research opportunities. The primary topical fields of study that emerged from the bibliometric analysis are impact, information, science, model, management, technology, knowledge and education. Pouris and Fourie are the most productive citations, h-index and g-index. The influential institute was The University of Pretoria. Research limitations/implications The use of the WoS database for data collecting limits this study. Because the WoS was the only citation and abstract database used in this study, bibliometric investigations using other citation and abstract databases like “Scopus”, “Google Scholar” and “Dimension” could be interesting. This study presented a bibliometric summary; nevertheless, a systematic and methodical examination of highly cited LIS research publications could throw more light on the subject. Practical implications This paper gives valuable information about recent scientific advancements in the LIS and emerging future academic subject prospects. Furthermore, this research work will serve as a reference for researchers in various areas to analyse the evolution of scholarly literature on a particular topic over time. Originality/value By identifying the standard channels of study in the LIS discipline, and the essential journals, publications, nations, institutions, authors, data sources and networks in this subject, this bibliometric mapping and visualisation provide new perspectives into academic performance. This paper also articulates future research directions in this realm of knowledge. This study is more rigorous and comprehensive in terms of the analytical procedures it uses.

show abstract

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mapping research output on library and information science research domain in South Africa: a bibliometric visualisation

Wani

Ganaie²,

Rehman³

2022

IDD

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The incumbent survey pointed out that most of the acquired publications were published by the crowning operational countries like the USA, UK, Canada and Australia. These findings are supported by prior studies, in line with the notion that the most influential documents and authors are from developed nations (Parmar et al ., 2020; Akintunde et al., 2021; Ganaie and Wani, 2021; Maalouf et al. , 2021; Sweileh, 2021; Siwach and Parmar, 2018).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Bibliometric approaches are well known for assessing the output and impact of scientific publications. Researchers can compare various scientific elements by using bibliometric methods (Ganaie and Wani, 2021;Singh and Chander, 2014). Bibliometric approaches are critical for recognising the strengths and weaknesses of any field of study (Bornmann et al, 2015;Zeinoun et al, 2020).…”

Section: Bibliometricsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The scientific outcome in the domain of grey literature: bibliometric mapping and visualisation using the R-bibliometrix package and the VOSviewer

Wani

Ganaie²

2022

LHT

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThe current study aims to map the scientific output of grey literature (GL) through bibliometric approaches.Design/methodology/approachThe source for data extraction is a comprehensive “indexing and abstracting” database, “Web of Science” (WOS). A lexical title search was applied to get the corpus of the study – a total of 4,599 articles were extracted for data analysis and visualisation. Further, the data were analysed by using the data analytical tools, R-studio and VOSViewer.FindingsThe findings showed that the “publications” have substantially grown up during the timeline. The most productive phase (2018–2021) resulted in 47% of articles. The prominent sources were PLOS One and NeuroImage. The highest number of papers were contributed by Haddaway and Kumar. The most relevant countries were the USA and UK.Practical implicationsThe study is useful for researchers interested in the GL research domain. The study helps to understand the evolution of the GL to provide research support further in this area.Originality/valueThe present study provides a new orientation to the scholarly output of the GL. The study is rigorous and all-inclusive based on analytical operations like the research networks, collaboration and visualisation. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this manuscript is original, and no similar works have been found with the research objectives included here.

show abstract

“…Bibliometrics uses quantitative and statistical approaches to describe publishing patterns and contribution trends within a given subject area. The data produced by bibliometric analysis are useful because they allow researchers to compare different research topics, scientists, organizations and countries (Ganaie and Wani, 2021; Rehman et al , 2023; Wani and Ganaie, 2022). It is extremely difficult to cover all the items in the literature.…”

Section: Review Of Literaturementioning

confidence: 99%

The current research landscape in digital marketing scientific literature in libraries: exploration through performance and science mapping

Wani

2023

DLP

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose This study aims to analyse and understand the current state of research in the field of digital marketing in “library and information science”. Design/methodology/approach This study used a “bibliometric research design.” A lexical title search was used to obtain the required data set for executing this study, and a comprehensive “indexing and abstracting” database, Web of Science, was used as a data harvesting source. Louvain’s clustering algorithm was used for network metrics. Findings The findings revealed that research productivity and impact have grown considerably over time, indicating significant attention towards digital marketing research in library and information science (LIS). Moreover, the results showed that the overall author collaboration patterns were weak, hence creating room for development in the author’s collaboration patterns. Practical implications The current study could be very beneficial in providing a comprehensive and up-to-date overview of the “digital marketing” research field scholarly output in LIS, which can be used by researchers, practitioners and policymakers to guide their work and make informed decisions. Originality/value The originality of this bibliometric study lies in its comprehensive and up-to-date analysis of the current state of research in the field of “digital marketing” in LIS. This study provides a unique and in-depth understanding of the key authors, venues and papers in the field, as well as the trends and patterns in the research.

show abstract

Bibliometric analysis and visualization of Nanotechnology Research Field

Cited by 7 publications

References 51 publications

Mapping research output on library and information science research domain in South Africa: a bibliometric visualisation

Mapping research output on library and information science research domain in South Africa: a bibliometric visualisation

The scientific outcome in the domain of grey literature: bibliometric mapping and visualisation using the R-bibliometrix package and the VOSviewer

The current research landscape in digital marketing scientific literature in libraries: exploration through performance and science mapping

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About