Bibliometric Analysis of Methods and Tools for Drought Monitoring and Prediction in Africa

Abstract

The African continent has a long history of rainfall fluctuations of varying duration and intensities. This has led to varying degrees of drought conditions, triggering research interest across the continent. The research presented here is a bibliometric analysis of scientific articles on drought monitoring and prediction published in Africa. Scientific data analysis was carried out based on bibliometric mapping techniques applied to 332 scientific publications (1980 to 2020) retrieved from the Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus databases. In addition, time series of Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index for the previous 6 months (SPEI-6) over six regions in the continent was analysed giving the relative comparison of drought occurrences to the annual distribution of the scientific publications. The results revealed that agricultural and hydrological drought studies contributed about 75% of the total publications, while the remaining 25% was shared among socioeconomic and meteorological studies. Countries in the southern, western, and eastern regions of Africa led in terms of scientific publications during the period under review. The results further indicated that the continent experienced drought conditions in the years 1984, 1989, 1992, and 1997, thereby inducing an increase in the number of scientific publications on drought studies. The results show that the tools of analysis have also changed from simple statistics to the use of geospatial tools such as Remote Sensing (RS) and Geographical Information System (GIS) models, and recently Machine Learning (ML). The ML, particularly, contributed about 11% of the total scientific publications, while RS and GIS models, and basic statistical analysis account for about 44%, 20%, and 25% respectively. The integration of spatial technologies and ML are pivotal to the development of robust drought monitoring and drought prediction systems, especially in Africa, which is considered as a drought-prone continent. The research gaps presented in this study can help prospective researchers to respond to the continental and regional drought research needs.

Mapping research output on library and information science research domain in South Africa: a bibliometric visualisation

“…Molatudi et al (2009) examined “bioinformatics research in South Africa” (Wambu and Ho, 2016) investigated “drinking water research in Africa” and “energy research” (Pouris, 2016). The other prominent fields of research gauged through bibliometric lenses are “research partnerships” (Onyancha, 2020), “drought monitoring and prediction” (Adisa et al , 2020), “diabetes research” (Okaiyeto and Oguntibeju, 2021), “nanoscience” (Makhoba and Pouris, 2017), “health economic evaluation” (Hernandez-Villafuerte et al , 2016) and “COVID-19 research” (Guleid et al , 2021).…”

A bibliometric analysis of tropical mangrove forest land use change from 2010 to 2020

“…This is because there have been limited studies and updated reviews on land use change, particularly on remote sensing in the tropical region, which deserve to be highlighted. Accordingly, the database of the Academia provides the source for bibliometric analysis on drought monitoring study and prediction in Africa (Adisa et al, 2020 ). Meanwhile, numerous reviews are conducted on mangrove ecosystems (ResearchGate.net), recent status on mangrove in Brazil (mdpi.com) (Diniz et al, 2019 ), and carbon stock assessment of mangrove using remote sensing (ReseachGate.net) (Bindu et al, 2020 ).…”

The surveillance and prediction of food contamination using intelligent systems: a bibliometric analysis

“…This will need to be supplemented by big data mining and synthesis for effective evidence-based decision-making. These systems will require human resource capacity and complex digital systems to handle the immense volumes of data (Lee, 2017;Zhou et al, 2019;Adisa et al, 2020). This lack of capacity is a reality in developing countries where systems are usually not in place and the resources are limited (Mayet et al, 2011;Gould et al, 2013;Shonhiwa et al, 2019).…”