2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.syapm.2016.04.005
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bifidobacterium aerophilum sp. nov., Bifidobacterium avesanii sp. nov. and Bifidobacterium ramosum sp. nov.: Three novel taxa from the faeces of cotton-top tamarin ( Saguinus oedipus L.)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Members of the genus Bifidobacterium are purported to have beneficial consequences for human health (Backhed, Ley, Sonnenburg, Peterson, & Gordon, ; Guarner & Malagelada, ; Nowak, Paliwoda, & Blasiak, ; Tojo et al, ). Currently, GenBank Taxonomy recognizes 71 species of Bifidobacterium that have been isolated from the gastrointestinal tracts of mammals, birds and social insects as well as human‐impacted environments (Bottacini, Ventura, van Sinderen, & O'Connell Motherway, ; Killer et al, ; Michelini, Modesto et al, ; Milani et al, ). Bifidobacteria are noted for their ability to degrade ingested polysaccharides and proteins, and to synthesize vitamins and other nutrients that are beneficial to their hosts (Coakley et al, ; Kiyohara et al, ; Lugli et al, ; Milani et al, ; Milani, Lugli et al, ; O'Connell Motherway, Kinsella, Fitzgerald, & van Sinderen, ; Pompei et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Members of the genus Bifidobacterium are purported to have beneficial consequences for human health (Backhed, Ley, Sonnenburg, Peterson, & Gordon, ; Guarner & Malagelada, ; Nowak, Paliwoda, & Blasiak, ; Tojo et al, ). Currently, GenBank Taxonomy recognizes 71 species of Bifidobacterium that have been isolated from the gastrointestinal tracts of mammals, birds and social insects as well as human‐impacted environments (Bottacini, Ventura, van Sinderen, & O'Connell Motherway, ; Killer et al, ; Michelini, Modesto et al, ; Milani et al, ). Bifidobacteria are noted for their ability to degrade ingested polysaccharides and proteins, and to synthesize vitamins and other nutrients that are beneficial to their hosts (Coakley et al, ; Kiyohara et al, ; Lugli et al, ; Milani et al, ; Milani, Lugli et al, ; O'Connell Motherway, Kinsella, Fitzgerald, & van Sinderen, ; Pompei et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S1 and S2). One or wherever possible two representative strains for each group were selected and a total of eight strains were chosen (RST 8 and RST 16 T for Group I, RST 9 T for Group II, RST 7 and RST 11 for Group III, RST 19 for Group IV, RST 17 for Group V and RST 27 for Group VI) for 16S rRNA gene sequencing as described by Michelini et al [16].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of the phenotypic and chemotaxonomic characterization as well as the molecular-based methods phylogenetic analysis based on the 16S rRNA gene sequences, MLSA based on the concatenated five housekeeping gene sequences, and the wholegenome-based sequence comparisons in silico, strains RST 16 T and RST 9 T were genetically and phenotypically discernible from the currently recognized species of bifidobacteria; thus, according to Minimal Standard guidelines [16], they represent two novel taxa for which the name Bifidobacterium vespertilionis sp. nov. and Bifidobacterium rousetti sp.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strains used in this study, Bifidobacterium aesculapii MRM3/1 and MRM4/2, Bifidobacterium aerophilum TRE26 and Bifidobacterium avesanii TREC, are new bifidobacteria species isolated from primates that have been characterized from a morphological, biochemical and molecular point of view (Modesto et al ; Michelini et al ), while B. animalis subsp . lactis P32/1 was isolated from chicken faeces (Mattarelli et al ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These limitations have led to the collection of new Bifidobacterium strains correctly identified and characterized, with not only functional but also technological properties, for the development of new probiotics with the potential to be successfully incorporated into a food product (Pandey et al 2015). Numerous studies refer to bifidobacteria isolated from humans; in contrast, those relating to bifidobacteria from nonhuman sources are scarce (Ushida et al 2010;Endo et al 2012;D'Aimmo et al 2014;Modesto et al 2014;Tsuchida et al 2014;Michelini et al 2015Michelini et al , 2016.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%