Big data investments in knowledge and non-knowledge intensive firms: what the market tells us

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to investigate the value of big data investments by examining the market reaction to company announcements of big data investments and tests the effect for firms that are either knowledge intensive or not. Design/methodology/approach This study is based on an event study using data from two stock markets in China. Findings The stock market sees an overall index increase in stock prices when announcements of big data investments are revealed by grouping all the listed firms included in the sample. Increased stock prices are also the case for non-knowledge intensive firms. However, the stock market does not seem to react to big data investment announcements by testing the knowledge intensive firms along. Research limitations/implications This study contributes to the literature on assessing the economic value of big data investments from the perspective of big data information value chain by taking an unexpected change in stock price as the measure of the financial performance of the investment and by comparing market reactions between knowledge intensive firms and non-knowledge intensive firms. Findings of this study can be used to refine practitioners’ understanding of the economic value of big data investments to different firms and provide guidance to their future investments in knowledge management to maximize the benefits along the big data information value chain. However, findings of study should be interpreted carefully when applying them to companies that are not publicly traded on the stock market or listed on other financial markets. Originality/value Based on the concept of big data information value chain, this study advances research on the economic value of big data investments. Taking the perspective of stock market investors, this study investigates how the stock market reacts to big data investments by comparing the reactions to knowledge-intensive firms and non-knowledge-intensive firms. The results may be particularly interesting to those publicly traded companies that have not previously invested in knowledge management systems. The findings imply that stock investors tend to believe that big data investment could possibly increase the future returns for non-knowledge-intensive firms.

Harvesting reflective knowledge exchange for inbound open innovation in complex collaborative networks: an empirical verification in Europe

“…These capabilities allow firms to not only excel in forecasting, production and quality control management but also provide access to novel information for improved decision-making to gain a competitive advantage. The association between innovation performancemeasured by the number of patent applicationspatent quality and technological investments and BDA has been a cumbersome issue, as the quantification of the amount of the big data used by organizations is challenging (Zhang et al, 2017). However, previous studies used a wide range of measuresincluding information on investments for implementing big data, the size of data analyzed and patents using BDAto investigate these associations (Braganza et al, 2017).…”

Evaluating Occupational Health and Safety Management Strategy Success Factors for Small-Scale Contractors in Zambia

“…The next step was to assess the adequacy of the survey data using the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) and Bartlett's test of specificity for squared correlation between variables [26,29]. Following Tabachnick and Fidell [25], the KMO with a value close to 1 relates to relative compactness, distinct and reliable at a minimum value of 0.05 [27].…”

Possible negative effects of big data on decision quality in firms: The role of knowledge hiding behaviours

“…Therefore, big data is an important input or resource for knowledge creation (Côrte‐Real, Oliveira, & Ruivo, 2017). This knowledge can then be transferred among employees and be used for decision making (Zhang et al, 2017). Consequently, from an RBV standpoint, big data may be treated as an important organisational resource (Côrte‐Real et al, 2017; Kwon, Lee, & Shin, 2014; Opresnik & Taisch, 2015; Wamba et al, 2017).…”

“…Increasing the volume of data elevates knowledge generation potential (Ghasemaghaei, 2019; Intezari & Gressel, 2017; Pauleen, 2017). This is especially true if firms integrate multiple data sources (Arora & Rahman, 2016; Baboo & Kumar, 2013; Zhang et al, 2017). It also means that more effort is likely invested in generating knowledge from voluminous data compared to lower‐volume data and that sharing such knowledge may be more effortful (Jagadish et al, 2014; Shollo & Galliers, 2016).…”

“…Thus, many firms invest in big data initiatives (Agarwal & Dhar, 2014; Grover, Chiang, Liang, & Zhang, 2018). However, there are mixed findings about the value of such investments (Zhang, Wang, & Pauleen, 2017). Some studies suggest that big data initiatives improve firm decision‐making quality (Chen, Preston, & Swink, 2015; Wamba et al, 2017), which captures a firm's ability to make optimal decisions (Sharma, Mithas, & Kankanhalli, 2014).…”