Big Metadata, Smart Metadata, and Metadata Capital: Toward Greater Synergy Between Data Science and Metadata

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the paper is to provide a framework for addressing the disconnect between metadata and data science. Data science cannot progress without metadata research. This paper takes steps toward advancing the synergy between metadata and data science, and identifies pathways for developing a more cohesive metadata research agenda in data science.Design/methodology/approach: This paper identifies factors that challenge metadata research in the digital ecosystem, defines metadata and data science, and presents the concepts big metadata, smart metadata, and metadata capital as part of a metadata lingua franca connecting to data science. Findings:The "utilitarian nature" and "historical and traditional views" of metadata are identified as two intersecting factors that have inhibited metadata research. Big metadata, smart metadata, and metadata capital are presented as part of a metadata lingua franca to help frame research in the data science research space. Research limitations:There are additional, intersecting factors to consider that likely inhibit metadata research, and other significant metadata concepts to explore. Practical implications:The immediate contribution of this work is that it may elicit response, critique, revision, or, more significantly, motivate research. The work presented can encourage more researchers to consider the significance of metadata as a research worthy topic within data science and the larger digital ecosystem.Originality/value: Although metadata research has not kept pace with other data science topics, there is little attention directed to this problem. This is surprising, given that metadata is essential for data science endeavors. This examination synthesizes original and prior scholarship to provide new grounding for metadata research in data science.

Towards a machine learning approach to the analysis of indirect translation

“…The fundamental importance of reliable metadata was highlighted by this study, too. Metadata are a key component of knowledge discovery and prediction, and vital for accurate data interpretation by both humans and machines (Greenberg 2017). Metadata-rich corpora, such as the collaborative open-access translation repository Trans-Bank (Ustaszewski and Stauder 2017) can provide data for a range of research problems in (corpus-based) translation studies.…”

A Multiple Perspective Account of Digital Curation for Cultural Heritage: Tasks, Disciplines and Institutions

“…19 https://www.bearchaeo.com/ (last visited on 7 April 2020). 20 https://bearchaeo.unito.it/omeka-s (last visited on 15 April 2020).…”

“…Data Processing and Modelling is the process of creating a conceptual model for the data to be stored in a database, together with the associations between different data objects and the rules (E-R Model and UML are common). The resulting metadata deal with attributes "that describe, provide context, indicate the quality, or document another object (or data) characteristics" [20]. In order to ensure correct use and interpretation of the data by its owners and users, different scientific communities use different sets of metadata standards, such as, e.g., EML (Ecological Metadata Language), FGDC (Federal Geographic Data Committee) standard, and ISO 19115 (International Organization for Standardization Geographic information metadata).…”

Library cultures of data curation: Adventures in astronomy

“…Cleaning data sets can improve their quality and make it easier for prospective reusers to understand its contents (Arora, Esteva, & Trelogan, 2014). Providing accompanying metadata and other information about provenance can help prospective reusers to find and interpret the data set, and to make judgments about its quality (Fear & Donaldson, 2012; Greenberg, 2017). Linking the data set to other knowledge products such as code and journal articles can promote reproducibility (Brinckman et al, 2019).…”