BIGCCS Innovations – Measures to Accelerate CCS Deployment

Mølnvik, Mona J.; Aarlien, Rune; Henriksen, Partow Pakdel; Munkejord, Svend Tollak; Tangen, Grethe; Jakobsen, Jana P.

doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2016.01.009

Cited by 4 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Three to four stages are typical if the CO 2 is available at 1 bara, but compression might also not be necessary if the CO 2 is already available at high pressure, as in scenarios 3 and 4. A compression stage includes a compressor, an intercooler, and a flash separator removing condensed water.After the compression train, the CO 2 stream passes into an impurity removal unit 2 where potential impurities are removed if required. It is cooled and condensed through a pre-cooler 3 and a liquefier cooled by an ammonia refrigeration loop 4 .…”

Section: Co 2 Liquefactionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The cost of CO 2 conditioning and transport [20], expressed by Equation (2), is used in this study as a cost performance metric for both optimisation and comparison of the transport chains. This cost performance metric is computed considering a real discount rate of 8%, a project duration of 25 years, and an operating rate of 85%.…”

Section: Cost Performance Metricmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…One of the key technologies needed to decarbonise the power and industrial sectors is carbon capture and storage (CCS) [1]. Over the past decades, many extensive research [2][3][4][5], development [6,7], and demonstration [8,9] efforts have been taking place to bring CCS towards implementation. As a result, 28 large-scale CCS facilities have entered into operation, with many others currently at different stages of development [10].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

At what Pressure Shall CO2 Be Transported by Ship? An in-Depth Cost Comparison of 7 and 15 Barg Shipping

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The pipeline has historically been the preferred means to transport CO2 due to its low cost for short distances and opportunities for economies of scale. However, interest in vessel-based transport of CO2 is growing. While most of the literature has assumed that CO2 shipping would take place at low pressure (at 7 barg and −46 °C), the issue of identifying best transport conditions, in terms of pressure, temperature, and gas composition, is becoming more relevant as ship-based carbon capture and storage chains move towards implementation. This study focuses on an in-depth comparison of the two primary and relevant transport pressures, 7 and 15 barg, for annual volumes up to 20 MtCO2/year and transport distances up to 2000 km. We also address the impact of a number of key factors on optimal transport conditions, including (a) transport between harbours versus transport to an offshore site, (b) CO2 pressure prior to conditioning, (c) the presence of impurities and of purity constraints, and (d) maximum feasible ship capacities for the 7 and 15 barg options. Overall, we have found that 7 barg shipping is the most cost-efficient option for the combinations of distance and annual volume where transport by ship is the cost-optimal means of transport. Furthermore, 7 barg shipping can enable significant cost reductions (beyond 30%) compared to 15 barg shipping for a wide range of annual volume capacities.

show abstract

Section: Co 2 Liquefactionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Cost Performance Metricmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

At what Pressure Shall CO2 Be Transported by Ship? An in-Depth Cost Comparison of 7 and 15 Barg Shipping

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In this study, we are investigating the potential value creation from application of innovations created in a major CCS research centre; The BIGCCS International CCS Research Centre [4]. BIGCCS was mainly funded by the Research Council of Norway and participating industry partners.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Profiting from CCS Innovations: A Study to Measure Potential Value Creation from CCS Research and Development

Størset

Tangen

2019

SSRN Journal

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Globally, large private and public budgets are invested into carbon capture and storage (CCS) research to provide the knowledge and technology required to mitigate CO2 emissions below a sustainable level. A pertinent question to ask is whether this is the best way of spending limited funds? This paper presents an ongoing study aiming to document the potential value creation from selected CCS innovations created in the international research centre BIGCCS and its successor NCCS. The results indicate that the potential profits by far exceed the investment.

show abstract

Profiting from CCS innovations: A study to measure potential value creation from CCS research and development

Størset

Tangen

Berstad

et al. 2019

International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BIGCCS Innovations – Measures to Accelerate CCS Deployment

Cited by 4 publications

References 27 publications

At what Pressure Shall CO2 Be Transported by Ship? An in-Depth Cost Comparison of 7 and 15 Barg Shipping

At what Pressure Shall CO2 Be Transported by Ship? An in-Depth Cost Comparison of 7 and 15 Barg Shipping

Profiting from CCS Innovations: A Study to Measure Potential Value Creation from CCS Research and Development

Profiting from CCS innovations: A study to measure potential value creation from CCS research and development

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About