2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.01.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bill coloration, a flexible signal in a tropical passerine bird, is regulated by social environment and androgens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
57
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
3
57
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Evidence from a comparative analysis of sexual dimorphism in the Maluridae family suggests that the evolution of female bill coloration is a product of selection on females themselves (Karubian, 2013), rather than simply a byproduct of selection on the male phenotype (Lande, 1980). Female bill coloration is important in socio-sexual signaling in other avian species (Burley and Coopersmith, 1987;Murphy et al, 2009), as well as in male red-backed fairy-wrens (Karubian et al, 2011;Lindsay et al, 2009), and can be modulated by T in females (Lahaye et al, 2013;McGraw, 2006;Pham et al, 2014). Thus, androgens circulating in females at physiological rather than pharmacological levels (as induced by T implantation) can act on trait expression and may be the target of selection for mediating functionally significant variation in female ornamentation (Goymann and Wingfield, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Evidence from a comparative analysis of sexual dimorphism in the Maluridae family suggests that the evolution of female bill coloration is a product of selection on females themselves (Karubian, 2013), rather than simply a byproduct of selection on the male phenotype (Lande, 1980). Female bill coloration is important in socio-sexual signaling in other avian species (Burley and Coopersmith, 1987;Murphy et al, 2009), as well as in male red-backed fairy-wrens (Karubian et al, 2011;Lindsay et al, 2009), and can be modulated by T in females (Lahaye et al, 2013;McGraw, 2006;Pham et al, 2014). Thus, androgens circulating in females at physiological rather than pharmacological levels (as induced by T implantation) can act on trait expression and may be the target of selection for mediating functionally significant variation in female ornamentation (Goymann and Wingfield, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…40 µl) from actively nesting birds before injecting them with 10 µl of either phosphate-buffered saline (control: males N=7, females N=6) or phosphate-buffered saline containing 500 ng of dissolved chicken GnRH (GnRH-I; American Peptide Company, 54-8-23; treatment: males N=39, females N=4). This dosage has been shown to cause maximal LH response in other passerines (Wingfield and Farner, 1993) and to elevate androgen production in male redbacked fairy-wrens (Karubian et al, 2011). See Barron et al (2015) for further details.…”
Section: Testosterone Manipulation and Gnrh Challengementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…No studies have attempted to explicitly link melanin in bare parts to aggression or dominance, but black bill color is linked to testosterone expression in House Sparrows and Red-backed Fairywrens (Malurus melanocephalus; Laucht et al 2010, Karubian et al 2011). In the families Phasianidae and Rallidae, comb and wattle size predicts the outcome of dominance interactions (Allee et al 1939, Collias 1943, Gullion 1951, Gjesdal 1977, Moss et al 1979, Holder and Montgomerie 1993, Buchholz 1997, Mateos and Carranza 1997, Zuk and Johnsen 2000, Dey et al 2014.…”
Section: Bare Parts In Competitive Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, communication signals that are regulated by sex steroids rarely reflect sex steroid levels at the time the signals are produced (Adkins-Regan, 2008), which should make it even less likely that signals could accurately reflect other behaviorally relevant phenotypic traits regulated by sex steroids. Various factors can mask or impair phenotypic integration and ultimately compromise signal reliability, for instance differences in tissue sensitivity, receptor density or binding affinity, the time scale of the response to hormone levels, the plasticity of the signal, or the intervention of other hormonal regulators (Adkins-Regan, 2008;Ball et al, 2008;Kempenaers et al, 2008;Karubian et al, 2011). Despite these theoretical limitations, endogenous androgen levels (testosterone and 11-KT) are tightly linked to the duration of the EOD's second phase (Fig.3) .…”
Section: Can a Hormone-responsive Signal Convey Reliable Information mentioning
confidence: 99%