2018
DOI: 10.1155/2018/4634898
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bioaugmentation with Mixed Hydrogen-Producing Acetogen Cultures Enhances Methane Production in Molasses Wastewater Treatment

Abstract: Hydrogen-producing acetogens (HPA) have a transitional role in anaerobic wastewater treatment. Thus, bioaugmentation with HPA cultures can enhance the chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal efficiency and CH4 yield of anaerobic wastewater treatment. Cultures with high degradation capacities for propionic acid and butyric acid were obtained through continuous subculture in enrichment medium and were designated as Z08 and Z12. Bioaugmentation with Z08 and Z12 increased CH4 production by glucose removal to 1.58. Bi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in Stage III, the contribution rate decreased to 77.4% because the biohydrogen production efficiency in compartment II was significantly enhanced. Although a certain amount of hydrogenproducing acetogens was enriched in other compartments, their contribution to the total biohydrogen production of ABR was relatively low due to the limitation of fermentation substrates (carbohydrates) and hydrogen consumption of methanogens and homoacetogen [21]. Compartment 2 showed the highest contribution rate of 18.5% in Stage III, whereas compartment 4 presented little contribution rate for biohydrogen production.…”
Section: Biohydrogen Production Efficiency In Abrmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, in Stage III, the contribution rate decreased to 77.4% because the biohydrogen production efficiency in compartment II was significantly enhanced. Although a certain amount of hydrogenproducing acetogens was enriched in other compartments, their contribution to the total biohydrogen production of ABR was relatively low due to the limitation of fermentation substrates (carbohydrates) and hydrogen consumption of methanogens and homoacetogen [21]. Compartment 2 showed the highest contribution rate of 18.5% in Stage III, whereas compartment 4 presented little contribution rate for biohydrogen production.…”
Section: Biohydrogen Production Efficiency In Abrmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In Compartment IV, the biogas production rate decreased the least; the reason was attributed to the further enrichment of methanogens (Figures 4-7) in Stage II. The presence and metabolism of methanogens were conducive to the enrichment of HPA [2,6]. However, the biohydrogen production efficiency in Compartment IV was low due to the hydrogen consumption [23,24] and still showed a decreasing trend.…”
Section: Effect Of Biomass On Biohydrogen Production Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Compartment IV, the content of biohydrogen in biogas increased significantly in the previous stage and then decreased, while the content of methane significantly increased. Therefore, the methanogens in Compartment IV were further enriched and presented dominant position [2,6,14] although the biomass was relatively low. The presence and metabolism of methanogens were conducive to the enrichment of HPA.…”
Section: Enrichment Of Hpa and Biohydrogen Production Efficiency Of Abrmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They can effectively reduce the contaminant load by transforming it into less dangerous compounds through the specialised‐microorganisms which include indigenous or allochthonous wild‐types or genetically modified organisms (Park et al , 2008). Many screened strains or acclimated microbial consortia are shown significant ability of degradating recalcitrant or toxic organics (Chen et al , 2016; Wang et al , 2018). But up to now, there have been few reports on the biological degradation of EG.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%