Bioceramic a futuristic boon in endodontics

Darade, Lalit; Ranjan, Smita; Singh, Gangesh Bahadur; Gangadhar, B. V. M.; Vandekar, Mansi; Rathi, Akshita Govind

doi:10.53730/ijhs.v6ns1.7356

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…On the other hand, if the clinical diagnosis is reversible pulpitis, partial pulpotomies have a high success rate, which is comparatively less invasive than root canal therapy. [15][16][17] while DPC is an even more conservative option, as mentioned above, it uses a bioactive material to produce a dentine-like protective matrix to protect the pulp vitality.…”

Section: Direct Pulp Capping (Dpc)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Recent developments in bioactive pulp capping materials (direct and indirect)

Khan

2022

ijhs

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The field of dentistry is rapidly shifting its focus toward biologically active restorative materials. Bioactive materials are those capable of inducing and promoting the regeneration of the damaged tissue and remineralizing demineralized dentinal structure as a vital dental pulp is necessary for the long-term healthy survival of a tooth. Vital pulp therapy intends to protect and prevail the vitality of pulp tissue which gets compromised when subjected to mutilating factors like dental caries, trauma, and operative or restorative procedures. During the therapy, the said bioactive material initially forms a non-irritant protective bridge over the vital pulp and later stimulates the pulpal odontoblasts to produce a reparative dentinal barrier which later forms a barrier and protects the underlying pulp’s vitality. The vitality of a tooth needs to be intact protected because the consensus reports that endodontically treated teeth, particularly molars, reportedly have a reduced survival probability than the vital teeth. [1] These factual arguments lead to the development of biologically active restorative materials. This review article intends to provide a review of the modern products introduced in the category of bioactive restorative materials.

show abstract

Section: Direct Pulp Capping (Dpc)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Recent developments in bioactive pulp capping materials (direct and indirect)

Khan

2022

ijhs

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For enhanced adaptation and sealing of root canal space with a bioactive material that would improve the healing of periapical lesion, hydrophilic hydraulic calcium silicate root canal sealers "bioceramic sealers" have been recently recommended (Al-Haddad & Aziz, 2016). These hydraulic calcium silicate sealers have advantages such as: anti-inflammatory effect, antimicrobial, osteogenic, calcium ion release, biocompatibility, bioactivity, and expansion on setting (Darade et al, 2022), in addition, they promote physical and chemical bonds to dentin by creating hydroxyapatite precipitate at the dentinsealer interface during the setting. However, one disadvantage of these materials is in the difficulty in removing them from the root canal once they are set for later retreatment or post-space preparation (Washio et al, 2019).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessment of Coronal Microleakage Following Root Canal Obturation With Calcium Silicate Sealers

Barham,

Abiad,

Abdelsalam

2023

Egyptian Dental Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: This study compared in vitro the coronal sealing ability of four types of endodontic sealers One-Fil, ADSEAL, GuttaFlow Bioseal, BioRoot RCS Materials and Methods: Thirty-two single-rooted mandibular premolars were randomly divided into 4 groups (n=8). After Instrumentation, each group obturated using a different type of sealer as group 1: One-Fil, group 2 ADSEAL, group 3: GuttaFlow Bioseal, and group 4: BioRoot RCS. Teeth were cleared then subjected to a dye penetration test, then evaluated under stereomicroscope.Results: Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare dye penetration depth among the different endodontic sealers. Post-hoc analysis was conducted using Dunn's multiple comparison test. The mean score of dye penetration could be arranged from the least to the greatest as follows: One-Fil (1.38 ± 0.52) followed by ADSEAL (2.38 ± 0.52) without significant difference between them, however One-Fil recorded lower significant dye penetration compared to GuttaFlow Bioseal (2.5 ± 0.53) and BioRoot RCS which showed the highest mean of dye penetration (2.75 ± 0.46). Conclusions:Premixed calcium silicate sealer revealed the highest significant resistance against dye penetration while hand mixed calcium silicate sealer revealed the least resistance against coronal dye penetration.Clinical Relevance: All types of the investigated sealers allowed dye penetration with variable degrees, therefore, proper coronal and apical sealing with adequate final restoration is the key to successful treatment outcome.

show abstract

Bioceramic a futuristic boon in endodontics

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Recent developments in bioactive pulp capping materials (direct and indirect)

Recent developments in bioactive pulp capping materials (direct and indirect)

Assessment of Coronal Microleakage Following Root Canal Obturation With Calcium Silicate Sealers

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About