2015
DOI: 10.1089/wound.2014.0557
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biofilms and Wounds: An Overview of the Evidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
236
1
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 313 publications
(241 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
236
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…1,45 Management of wound dressings containing antibacterial agents is expected to be a feasible way to solve the problem. 1 However, improper use of antibiotics has led to serious antibiotic resistance problem, so it is necessary to find an alternative approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,45 Management of wound dressings containing antibacterial agents is expected to be a feasible way to solve the problem. 1 However, improper use of antibiotics has led to serious antibiotic resistance problem, so it is necessary to find an alternative approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These reductions are consistent with those observed in another series of in vitro tests in which Mepilex Ag, Mepilex Border Ag and a nanocrystalline-silver dressing (Acticoat 7) were compared ( Table 3). 58 Due to the protection against antimicrobial agents and immune response afforded by the matrix of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS), 60 biofilms are associated with persistent wound colonisation and an increased risk of systemic infection, a complication that may delay healing. Consequently, it is important to determine the effectiveness of antimicrobial dressings against bacteria growing as biofilms.…”
Section: Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Staphylococcus Aureus Candida Albicansmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polymicrobial biofilm presence has been reported to impair all wound healing when compared with the monospecies infection. 26 We can confirm dressing treatment followed by one UAW session resulted in effective wound cleansing and biofilm removal of all wounds of group 1 patients. Furthermore, swab sampling analysis showed a satisfactory clinical appearance and reduced bacteria presence with <10 4 CFU/mL.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%