2020
DOI: 10.3390/en13174318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biofouling Removal from Membranes Using Nonthermal Plasma

Abstract: An essential aspect of wastewater treatment systems based on membranes is fouling, which leads to a decrease in their performance and durability. The membrane biofouling is directly related to the deposition of biological particles (e.g., microorganisms in the form of biofilm) on the membrane surface. The objective of the study was to investigate the possibility of using nonthermal plasma for membrane treatment to overcome the biofouling problem. The removal of biological cells from the membrane surface was pe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the use of DBD plasma, the substrates were placed in an air gap between two electrodes, with an approx. 2 mm distance between the modified surface and the top electrode [ 40 , 41 ]. The process was conducted with a voltage of approx.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the use of DBD plasma, the substrates were placed in an air gap between two electrodes, with an approx. 2 mm distance between the modified surface and the top electrode [ 40 , 41 ]. The process was conducted with a voltage of approx.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plasma was applied to the biofoulant (activated sludge) on the membrane surfaces for 3–10 min, and the appropriate dosage was found to be 13–42 J cm 2 . The procedure for removing biofouling is quite effective, depending on the type of membrane and the amount of time it was exposed to non-thermal plasma [ 35 ]. Depending on treatment time, biofilm was reduced up to 3.5 log CFU/cm 2 against L. monocytogenes and S. Typhimurium [ 36 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%