2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00134-014-3540-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomarkers for AKI improve clinical practice: no

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(27 reference statements)
1
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the utility of oliguria as a predictor of acute kidney injury (AKI) in hospitalized patients is limited by its relative sensitivity but poor specificity [2,3]. To improve both the prediction of, and diagnosis of AKI, several biomarkers have been described over the last 2 decades reflecting functional impairment or tubular damage [4,5,6]. One would assume that any observed biomarker signal and the urinary output are intimately linked and this review is intended to elucidate the relationship between the two.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the utility of oliguria as a predictor of acute kidney injury (AKI) in hospitalized patients is limited by its relative sensitivity but poor specificity [2,3]. To improve both the prediction of, and diagnosis of AKI, several biomarkers have been described over the last 2 decades reflecting functional impairment or tubular damage [4,5,6]. One would assume that any observed biomarker signal and the urinary output are intimately linked and this review is intended to elucidate the relationship between the two.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is sufficient to say that many biomarkers reflect a general degree of severity of disease, rather than being specific for kidney injury, or suffer from difficulties in the analytic methodology [48]. Furthermore, biomarker studies vary in their cut-offs between positive and negative results [49]. As a result, potential harm may occur if important interventions (i.e., computed tomography with contrast or necessary administration of aminoglycosides) are delayed or withheld based on false positive biomarker results.…”
Section: Novel Biomarkersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…before alterations in traditional markers occur), enable differential diagnosis, stratify patients based on prognosis (progression, need for renal replacement therapy, recovery, survival) and to monitor the response to interventions and treatment. The integration of novel biomarkers into clinical practice should enable incremental diagnostic and prognostic information beyond that found by clinical evaluation or traditional markers alone (5,7). Numerous different urinary and serum proteins, molecules and -most recently -micro RNAs have been rigorously investigated during the last decade.…”
Section: Novel Biomarkers Of Akimentioning
confidence: 99%