2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117753
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomass burning organic aerosol from prescribed burning and other activities in the United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Transport during the MT season showed similarly distinct composition profiles depending on air mass origin. Air from EA exhibited higher concentrations of SO 2− 4 , O 3 , CH 4 , and NH + 4 , owing to urban emissions in continental outflow (Chuang et al, 2014;Talbot et al, 1997;Thornton et al, 1999;Umezawa et al, 2014;Wang et al, 2007) and extensive secondary aerosol formation (Hatakeyama et al, , 2004(Hatakeyama et al, , 2011Krupa and Manning, 1988;Matsui et al, 2014). In contrast, WP air is characterized as pure marine due to Figure 7.…”
Section: Chemical Composition Of Transported Air Massesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transport during the MT season showed similarly distinct composition profiles depending on air mass origin. Air from EA exhibited higher concentrations of SO 2− 4 , O 3 , CH 4 , and NH + 4 , owing to urban emissions in continental outflow (Chuang et al, 2014;Talbot et al, 1997;Thornton et al, 1999;Umezawa et al, 2014;Wang et al, 2007) and extensive secondary aerosol formation (Hatakeyama et al, , 2004(Hatakeyama et al, , 2011Krupa and Manning, 1988;Matsui et al, 2014). In contrast, WP air is characterized as pure marine due to Figure 7.…”
Section: Chemical Composition Of Transported Air Massesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Air from PSEA had much lower species concentrations than MC (Table 2) due to decreased emissions and increased potential for wet scavenging. Sampled MC air showed statistically significant differences between BL and FT concentrations for both gas and aerosol species (Table S2), indicative of emissions constrained to the BL, and exhibited strong biomass burning signals in its composition profile (e.g., N100-1000nm, CO, NO3 -, OA, and BC) (Maudlin 360 et al, 2015;Pósfai et al, 2003;Reid et al, 1998Reid et al, , 2005Theodoritsi et al, 2020;Yadav et al, 2017). We note that peaks of CO ( Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…As an indicator of aerosol hygroscopicity (Kreidenweis and Asa-Awuku, 2014;Malm et al, 2005;Svenningsson et 405 al., 2006), the ΔOA/ΔSO4 2ratio pointed to higher hygroscopicity in EA air than MC air (Cheung et al, 2020;Saxena et al, 1995;Wang et al, 2017Wang et al, , 2018Wang et al, , 2019. Interestingly, though peat burning in the MC has been associated with SO4 2- (Ikegami et al, 2001;, the elevated ΔOA/ΔSO4 2ratio in MC air (4.85 ± 0.24) is indicative of lower hygroscopicity, explainable by the high levels of OA emitted during biomass burning (Radzi bin Abas et al, 2004;Theodoritsi et al, 2020) or produced through gas-to-particle conversion during transport (Cappa et al, 2020;410 Mardi et al, 2018;Zhou et al, 2012). The lower ΔOA/ΔSO4 2ratio of EA air (0.75 ± 0.09) signaling high hygroscopicity is attributable to the high levels of SO2 in EA (Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This source contributes around 75 % of global combustion POA (Bond et al, 2004). In this work, the term biomass burning includes wildfires in forests and other areas; prescribed burning, which is a small wildfire set intentionally (Tian et al, 2008;Chiodi et al, 2018) in order to decrease the likelihood of major wildfires; agricultural waste burning; and residential burning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim of the current study is to implement the alternative VBS scheme proposed by Ciarelli et al (2017a, b) in the PMCAMx-SR (Source Resolved) model during different periods. These periods have already been investigated by Theodoritsi et al (2020b) using the default PMCAMx-SR scheme. That study concluded that during spring the PMCAMx-SR performance is good according to the criteria proposed by Morris et al (2005), but the model tends to underpredict the observed OA in the PM 2.5 size range.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%