2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01130.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomechanical effect of abutment on stability of orthodontic mini‐implant

Abstract: The biomechanical influences of primary factors on titanium mini-implant, which is used as an anchorage for orthodontic tooth movement, were quantified using the three-dimensional finite element method. Six types of finite element models were designed to show various thread pitches from 0.5 to 1.5 mm. Three models were designed with abutment and three other models without abutment. A traction force of 2 N was applied to the head of the mini-implant or abutment to be at 45 degrees to the bone surface. No remark… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
49
1
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
4
49
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…There are many investigators reporting that it should be between 100 and 200g 29 and that it would not be successful if it was > 200g. 3,[30][31][32][33][34] For this reason, the quantity of force was determined to be 150g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many investigators reporting that it should be between 100 and 200g 29 and that it would not be successful if it was > 200g. 3,[30][31][32][33][34] For this reason, the quantity of force was determined to be 150g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They recommended that initial torque values of 5-10 Ncm be used for adequate primary stability for an orthodontic mini-implant, and noted that poor initial stability after surgical insertion and subsequent lower secondary stability and osseointegration were responsible for the failure of mini-implants. 33 Wilmes et al…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparing these results to other orthodontic studies using FEA is challenging due to several differences between models. Many of the studies available in the literature do not model human anatomy ( Gracco et al, 2009;Motoyoshi et al, 2005) and are not 3-dimensional (Brettin et al, 2008), or require additional resolution (Jones et al, 2001). Cattaneo et al (2009) produced a similar high-quality model of two teeth and surrounding bone for evaluation of orthodontic tooth movement and resulting periodontal stresses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%