2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2018.10.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biosimilars: complements and comments on the recent statement of the SFR and CRI. Comment on: “Biosimilars: An opportunity. Position statement of the French Rheumatology Society (SFR) and Inflammatory Rheumatic Disease Club (CRI).” Schaeverbeke et al. Joint Bone Spine 2018;95:399-402

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two strategies for the use of biosimilars can be differentiated in patients already treated with an originator: mandatory switch or physician–patient shared decision. Physician–patient shared decision has been favored by rheumatology scientific societies, by an international consensus group and by patients association 6–8. Indeed, real-life studies reporting the acceptance of the switch from OE to SB4 in case of shared decision together with an optimised communication strategy have reported acceptance rates of 92%–99% 9 10.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two strategies for the use of biosimilars can be differentiated in patients already treated with an originator: mandatory switch or physician–patient shared decision. Physician–patient shared decision has been favored by rheumatology scientific societies, by an international consensus group and by patients association 6–8. Indeed, real-life studies reporting the acceptance of the switch from OE to SB4 in case of shared decision together with an optimised communication strategy have reported acceptance rates of 92%–99% 9 10.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%